Some thoughts of new public management model and possibility of applying in scientific and technological management in Vietnam

Authors

  • Luong Van Thang

Keywords:

New public management, State management, Science and technology, State management of science and technology

Abstract

New public management (NPM) is a model developed by many countries around the world to reform the state management system which primary purpose is to increase the efficiency of public bureaucracy apparatus serving for people. Results of performance in developed countries are assessed to be successful. Many developing countries also applied some of the main contents of this model in their reform process with varying levels of success, even failure. In Vietnam, the state management of science and technology (S&T) has been reformed since 28th September, 2004 when the Prime Minister issued Decision 171/2004/QD-TTg approved the Scheme on renovation of S&T management mechanism (hereinafter referred to as Decision 171). Over the past 10 years, the renovation of the state management mechanism in S&T has been strongly implemented and has resulted in many contents such as public finance, evaluation of the results of S&T projects/themes, devolution and decentralization in S&T management. However, the requirements of socio-economic development in the period of 2016-2020 are putting pressure on the continued vigorous innovation, synchronization of the effectiveness and efficiency of state management of S&T to contribute to strengthening S&T potential, develop national innovation system (NIS), uphold the creative capacity of all individuals, enterprises and organizations.
Within the framework of this article, the author will study the NPM model, the current state of NPM application in developing countries, and some  characteristics of Vietnam's current S&T management system. On that basis, the author raises some thoughts on the possibility of applying some contents of NPM to state management on S&T in our country in the coming period.
Code:17030602

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ti?ng Vi?t:
1. ??ng C?ng s?n Vi?t Nam. 2006. V?n ki?n ??i h?i ??ng toàn qu?c l?n th? X. Hà N?i, Nxb Chính tr? qu?c gia.
2. ??ng C?ng s?n Vi?t Nam. 2011. V?n ki?n ??i h?i ??ng toàn qu?c l?n th? XI. Hà N?i, Nxb Chính tr? qu?c gia.
3. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? s? 21/2000/QH10 ???c Qu?c h?i thông qua ngày 09/6/2000.14 Suy ngh? v? mô hình qu?n lý công m?i
4. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? s? 29/2013/QH13 ???c Qu?c h?i thông qua ngày 18/6/2013.
5. Ngh? quy?t s? 20-NQ/TW ngày 31/10/2012 c?a Ban ch?p hành Trung ??ng khóa XI v? phát tri?n khoa h?c và công ngh? ph?c v? s? nghi?p công nghi?p hóa, hi?n ??i hóa trong ?i?u ki?n kinh t? th? tr??ng ??nh h??ng xã h?i ch? ngh?a và h?i nh?p qu?c t?.
6. Quy?t ??nh s? 272/2003/Q?-TTg, ngày 31/12/2003 phê duy?t Chi?n l??c phát tri?n khoa h?c và công ngh? Vi?t Nam ??n n?m 2012.
7. Quy?t ??nh s? 171/2004/Q?-TTg, ngày 28/9/2004 phê duy?t ?? án ??i m?i c? ch? qu?n lý khoa h?c và công ngh?.
8. Quy?t ??nh s? 43/2010/Q?-TTg ngày 02/6/2010 phê duy?t Danh m?c các ch? tiêu th?ng kê KH&CN trong H? th?ng ch? tiêu th?ng kê qu?c gia.
9. Quy?t ??nh s? 418/2012/Q?-TTg, ngày 11/4/2012 phê duy?t Chi?n l??c phát tri?n khoa h?c và công ngh? giai ?o?n 2011-2012.
10. Quy?t ??nh s? 2658/Q?-BKHCN, ngày 08/12/2006 thành l?p và ban hành ?i?u l? t? ch?c và ho?t ??ng c?a V?n phòng các Ch??ng trình khoa h?c và công ngh? tr?ng ?i?m c?p Nhà n??c.
11. Quy?t ??nh s? 12/2008/Q?-BKHCN ngày 04/09/2008 ban hành m?t s? b?ng phân lo?i th?ng kê khoa h?c và công ngh?.
12. Quy?t ??nh s? 940/Q?-BKHCN, ngày 05/5/2014 thành l?p và ban hành ?i?u l? t? ch?c và ho?t ??ng c?a V?n phòng các ch??ng trình khoa h?c và công ngh? qu?c gia.
13. Thông t? s? 38/2014/TT-BKHCN ngày 16/12/2014 quy ??nh v? ?ánh giá t? ch?c KH&CN.
14. Thông t? s? 14/2015/TT-BKHCN ngày 19/8/2015 quy ??nh H? th?ng ch? tiêu th?ng kê ngành khoa h?c và công ngh?.
15. B? KH&CN. 2009. 50 n?m khoa h?c và công ngh? Vi?t Nam: 1959-2009. Hà N?i, Nxb Khoa h?c và k? thu?t.
16. B? KH&CN. 2010. Báo cáo t?ng k?t n?m 2010 và ph??ng h??ng ho?t ??ng n?m 2011.
17. B? KH&CN. 2011. Báo cáo t?ng k?t n?m 2011 và ph??ng h??ng ho?t ??ng n?m 2012.
18. B? KH&CN. 2012. Báo cáo t?ng k?t n?m 2012 và ph??ng h??ng ho?t ??ng n?m 2013.
19. B? KH&CN. 2013. Báo cáo t?ng k?t n?m 2013 và ph??ng h??ng ho?t ??ng n?m 2014.
20. B? KH&CN. 2014. Báo cáo t?ng k?t n?m 2014 và ph??ng h??ng ho?t ??ng n?m 2015.
21. B? KH&CN. 2014. Khoa h?c và Công ngh? Vi?t Nam n?m 2013. Hà N?i, Nxb Khoa h?c và k? thu?t.
22. Tr?n Thanh Lâm. 2011. Qu?n lý nhà n??c v? khoa h?c, công ngh? và môi tr??ng, tài nguyên, trong H?c vi?n hành chính. Qu?n lý nhà n??c ??i v?i ngành, l?nh v?c. Hà N?i, Nxb Khoa h?c và k? thu?t, tr.375-407.
23. Bùi Huy Khiên. 2013. Qu?n lý công. Hà N?i, Nxb Chính tr? hành chính.
24. Nguy?n Vi?t Vy. 2013. So sánh và phân bi?t gi?a qu?n lý công truy?n th?ng v?i qu?n lý công m?i, xem 22/4/2013, <http://www.quangngai.gov.vn/Pages/qnpsosanhvaphanbietgiua-qnpnd-24722-qnpnc-99-qnpsite-1.html>.JSTPM T?p 6, S? 1, 2017 15
25. Thái Xuân Sang. 2014. So sánh mô hình qu?n lý công m?i (hành chính phát tri?n) v?i mô hình hành chính truy?n th?ng. T?p chí Sinh ho?t lý lu?n, s? 5 (126).
26. Nguy?n V?n Viên. 2014. V?n d?ng các y?u t? c?a mô hình qu?n lý công m?i trong ?i?u ki?n c?i cách hành chính ? Vi?t Nam, xem 22/11/2014, <http://xn--
nguynvnvin26-web06ah450b.vn/?page=newsDetail&id=773421>.
Ti?ng Anh:
27. Polidano. 1999. The new public management in developing countries, Institute for Development Policy and Management. University of Manchester. IDPM Public Policy Management Working Paper, No. 13, November 1999.
28. Polidano và Hulme. 1999. Public management reform in developing countries: issues and outcomes. Public Management: An international Journal of research and theory, 1461-997 X, Vol.1, Issue 1:1999, pp. 121-132.
29. Manning. 2001. The legacy of the New Public Management in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, SAGE Publications, Vol. 67 (2001), pp.297-312.
30. Savas E.S. 2001. “Privitatizaion and the New public management”. Fordham Urban Law Journal, Berkeley Electronic Press.
31. Naz. 2003. Origin, Ideas and Practice of New Public Management: Lessons for Developoing countries. Asian Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 3: 30-48
32. Haque, M. Shamsul. 2004. “New Public Management: Origins, Dimensions, and Critical Implications”. In Krishna K. Tummala (ed.). Public Administration and
Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers Ltd.
33. Muller Y. and Dunn N. 2006. A critical theory of new public management, <http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/nispacee/unpan025566.pdf>
34. Pollitt. 2007. The New Public Management: an overview of its current status. Administraties Management Public (8/2007).
35. Alonso et al. 2011. “Did New Public Management matter? An empirical analysis of the sourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size”, MPRA Paper No. 43255, <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43255/1/MPRA_paper_43255.pdf>.
36. Ibrahim A. 2012. “Is new public management irrelevant to developing countries?” Einternational Relations Students, see 19/10/2012, <http://www.e-ir.info/2012/10/19/is-new-public-management-irrelevant-to-developing-countries/>.
37. Mathachan. 2014. Public management reforms in developing countries. <shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/21366/13/13_chapter3.pdf>
38. OECD/WB. 2014. Science, Technology and Innovation in Viet Nam, OECD Publishing, Paris

Downloads

Published

05-12-2017

How to Cite

Thang, L. V. (2017). Some thoughts of new public management model and possibility of applying in scientific and technological management in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 6(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/183

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017)

Section

STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).