Some remaining problems and solutions for them in establishment of industrial property rights in Vietnam
Keywords:
Intellectual property, Industrial property, Establishment of industrial propertyAbstract
Intellectual properties in general and industrial properties (IP) in particular are efficient tools for socio-economic development. Exclusivity is the key content of legal regulations for protection of industrial property rights. It creates high competitive potentials and, at the same time, encourages social actors to make more new IP creativities for exclusive rights to protection. However, the time for examination of applications for establishment of IP rights is long actually in Vietnam and the low quality of applications cause impacts production and business activities of enterprises. The first part of the paper deals with the role of establishment of IP rights in socio-economic development. The next part of the paper provides analysis and remarks some remaining problems and reasons in aspects of establishment of IP rights; trends of development of activities of establishment of IP rights in the world. The last part deals with solutions proposed for higher effectiveness of activities of establishment of IP rights in Vietnam. This paper is the research result by the author through analysis of documents, in-depth interviews of experts in authority institutions, management agencies and enterprises. The scope of applications dealt in the paper is of national trademarks, inventions, utilities and industrial designs.
Downloads
References
1. Luật Sở hữu trí tuệ số 50/2005/QH11 ngày 29/11/2005.
2. Luật Sở hữu trí tuệ sửa đổi số 36/2009/QH12 ngày 19/06/2009.
3. WIPO, 2001. Cẩm nang Sở hữu trí tuệ: Chính sách, Pháp luật và Áp dụng // “Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ biên dịch và xuất bản .
4. Bộ Khoa học và Công nghệ, 2017, “Dự thảo Báo cáo tổng kết 10 năm thi hành Luật Sở hữu trí tuệ”, Hội nghị tổng kết 10 năm thi hành Luật sở hữu trí tuệ, Hà Nội ngày 19/05/2017, Hồ Chí Minh ngày 23/05/2017.
5. Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ, 2017. Báo cáo thường niên: Hoạt động sở hữu trí tuệ 2016, Hà Nội.
6. Shahid Alikhan, 2000. Lợi ích kinh tế-xã hội của việc bảo hộ sở hữu trí tuệ ở các nước đang phát triển, Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ biên dịch “Socio-economic benefits of intellectual property protection in developing countries” và xuất bản.
7. Kamil Idris, 2003. Sở hữu trí tuệ - Một công cụ đắc lực để phát triển kinh tế // Intellectual Property: A Power Tool for Economic Growth. Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ biên dịch và xuất bản.
8. Phạm Tuấn Anh, 2011. Quản lý nhà nước về Sở hữu trí tuệ, Nhà xuất bản Khoa học và Kỹ thuật, Hà Nội.
Tiếng Anh
9. OECD, 2004. Patents and innovation: trends and policy challenges, OECD Publications, Paris, France.
10. OECD, 2016. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
11. National Research Council, 1993. Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
12. Lester C. Thurow, 1997. “Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights”, Harvard Business Review, September-October 1997, 95-103.
13. Wiliam M Lander & Richard A. Posner, 1988. “The economics of Trademark Law”, The Trademark Reporter No. 78, May-June 1988, pp. 270-271.
14. Hisamitsu Azai, 1999. Intellectual Property Policies for the Twenty-First CenturyThe Japanese Experience in Wealth Creation, WIPO publication, WIPO.
15. Barton, J. H., Abbott, F. M., Correa, C. M., Drexl, J., Foray, D. and Marchant, R., 2007. Views on the Future of the Intellectual Property System, ICTSD Programme on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland
16. The Patent Cooperation Treaty, 2009. “Pilot of Patent Prosecution Highway Program to use PCT Work Products”, PCT Newsletter, No. 12/2009, pp. 1.
17. The Patent Cooperation Treaty, 2010. “The Trilateral Offices commence PCT-Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot”, PCT Newsletter, No. 02/2010, pp. 2.
18. The Patent Cooperation Treaty, 2010. “Factors to be considered when deciding whether or not to file a demand for international preliminary examination” (Views of David Reed), Practical Advice, PCT Newsletter, No. 04/2010, pp. 8ff.
19. Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization, <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283854>, Access date 11.06.2014>.
20. Roland Berger, 2014. Think Act Industry 4.0: The new industrial revolution How Europe will succeed, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, <http://www.iberglobal.com/files/Roland_Berger_Industry.pdf>, Access date 04.10.2017.
21. Klaus Schwab, 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond, The World Economic Forum, <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-itmeans-and-how-to-respond/>, Access date 01.11.2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
