Criteria for evaluation of policies for promotion of innovation by enterprises

  • Nguyen Quang Tuan
  • Bui Thi Hong Viet
  • Nguyen Thi Lan Huong
Keywords: Innovation, Policy, Evaluation of policies, Enterprise

Abstract

Innovation is one of important factors to help enterprises in enhancing their competition positions and then pushing up fast and sustainable socio-economic development in international competitive markets. This fact is internationally acknowledged largely. In actual global competitive context, enterprises are facing a tough choice: innovation and R&D or bankruptcy. Supports from the State through policies and mechanisms are important driving forces to push enterprises to do innovations for development. The set up of criteria for evaluation of policies for promotion of innovation by enterprises has highly important roles for decision making by individuals or organizations. This paper is to give answers to the following questions: (i) What are policies for promotion of innovation by enterprises? (ii) What are factors which make impacts to policies for promotion of innovation by enterprises? and (iii) What are criteria for evaluation of policies for promotion innovation by enterprises?

Code: 19060701

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tiếng Việt
1. Luật Ban hành văn bản quy phạm pháp luật, Luật số 80/2015/QH13 được Quốc hội thông qua ngày 22/6/2015.
2. Nghị định số 34/2016/NĐ-CP ngày 14/5/2016 của Chính phủ Quy định chi tiết một số điều và biện pháp thi hành Luật Ban hành văn bản quy phạm pháp luật.
3. Thông tư số 04/2018/TT-BKHCN ngày 15/5/2018 của Bộ KH&CN Quy định các cuộc điều tra thống kê KH&CN ngoài Chương trình điều tra thống kê quốc gia.
4. Đoàn Thị Thu Hà, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Huyền, 2010. Giáo trình Chính sách kinh tế. Hà Nội, Nxb Khoa học và Kỹ thuật.
5. Vũ Cao Đàm, 2011. Giáo trình Khoa học chính sách. Hà Nội, Nxb Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
6. Nguyễn Đăng Thành, 2012. “Đánh giá chính sách công ở Việt Nam: vấn đề và giải pháp”. Tạp chí Cộng sản online, xem 17/12/2012, .
7. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hoa, 2018. “Mối tương quan trong đánh giá chính sách giữa Việt Nam và Nhật Bản”. Học viện Báo chí và Tuyên truyền, xem 27/12/2018, .
Tiếng Anh
8. OECD, 2005. Guideline for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edition, Oslo manual.
9. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY, USA and London, UK: Harper & Brothers.
10. Schumpeter, 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Transaction Publishers.
11. Nisbett, R. and L. Ross, 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
12. Soderstrom, E.J, 1981. Social Impact Assessment, New York: Praeger Press.
13. DiMento, J.F, 1982. Much ado about Environmental Stressor Research: Policy Implications. In Evans, G. (ed), Environmental Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds), 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. James E. Anderson, 1983. Public Policymaking, Thomson Learning.
16. Rabel J. Burdge, 1987. The Social Impact Assessment Model and the Planning Process, Environmental Impact Assessment Revzew, 7(2), 141-150.
17. Katherine A. Lyon, 1990. Factors influencing public policy maker interpretation of impact assessments, Impact Assessment, 8:1-2, 249-260, DOI:10.1080/07349165.1990.9726041,
18. Lundvall, 1992. National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers.
19. Nelson, R. R., 1993. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, New York, Oxford University Press.
20. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G, 1994. The financial implications of fit between competitive strategy and innovation types and sources, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 5(2), 183-211. DOI: 10.1016/1047-8310(94)90002-7.
21. Chesbrough, Henry William, 2003. Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 978-1578518371.
22. POP, 2009.
23. Salahuddin M. Aminuzzaman, 2015. Dynamics of Public Policy: Determinants of Policymaking and Implementation in Bangladesh, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia, Public Administration, Governance and Globalization 15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15218-913.
24. Sabet, SM, Heard, AC, Neilitz, S and Brown, AN, 2017. Assessing the evidence base on science, technology, innovation and partnerships for accelerating development outcomes, 3ie Scoping Paper 6. Washington, DC: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
25. Theodore Henderson, 2017. Why Innovation Is Crucial To Your Organization's LongTerm Success, Forbes Councils.
Published
2019-07-16
How to Cite
Tuan, N., Viet, B., & Huong, N. (2019, July 16). Criteria for evaluation of policies for promotion of innovation by enterprises. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 8(2), 21-34. Retrieved from http://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/297
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT

Most read articles by the same author(s)