Some viewpoints on science and technology reform: Issues to be considered when making science and technology policy
Keywords:
S&T policy, Science, technology and innovation (STI), Basic researchAbstract
Science and technology (S&T) always plays an important role in and is a driving force of socio-economic development of each country or each region, especially in the presently default knowledge economy. By a synthesis approach, this article presented views or management models of S&T which had been drawn from research findings by organizations and experts worldwide. Discussions and proposals in this article relating to S&T research highlighted the role of basic research in promoting the world knowledge economy and expected that it would create a platform to facilitate the determination of direction and identification of issues need to be considered when making reform of S&T policy in Vietnam, which was found still limited in the context of international integration.
Code: 16031601
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. David P. and Das Gupta P. (1994) Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 pp. 487-521
2. Michael Gibbons et al. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
3. Marie L. Garcia and Olin H. Bray. (1997) Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
4. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. (1998) The endless transition: a 'Triple Helix' of university industry government relations. Minerva 36.3, pp. 203-208.
5. Bo Carlsson et al. (2002) Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy 31.2, pp. 233-245.
6. Sa C. (2005) Research Policy in Emerging Economies: Brazil’s Sector Funds. Minerva 43, pp. 245-263.
7. Heinze, T. (2008) How to sponsor ground breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes. Science and Public Policy 35, pp. 202-218
8. Jonkers, K. and Tijssen R. (2008) Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77 pp. 309-333
9. Patries Boekholt et al. (2009) Drivers of International collaboration in research. Final Report 40.
10. Diana Hicks. (2012) Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy 41.2, pp. 251-261.
11. Jacob, M. and Meek L. (2012) Scientific mobility and international research networks: trends and policy tools for promoting research excellence and capacity building. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), pp. 331-344
12. Iain Chalmers et al. (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet 383.9912, pp. 156-165.
13. Heitor Manuel, Hugo Horta, and Joana Mendonça. (2014) Developing human capital and research capacity: science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82, pp. 6-22.
14. Padilla-Pérez, R. and Gaudin, Y. (2014) Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43pp. 749-759.
2. Michael Gibbons et al. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.
3. Marie L. Garcia and Olin H. Bray. (1997) Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
4. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. (1998) The endless transition: a 'Triple Helix' of university industry government relations. Minerva 36.3, pp. 203-208.
5. Bo Carlsson et al. (2002) Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy 31.2, pp. 233-245.
6. Sa C. (2005) Research Policy in Emerging Economies: Brazil’s Sector Funds. Minerva 43, pp. 245-263.
7. Heinze, T. (2008) How to sponsor ground breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes. Science and Public Policy 35, pp. 202-218
8. Jonkers, K. and Tijssen R. (2008) Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77 pp. 309-333
9. Patries Boekholt et al. (2009) Drivers of International collaboration in research. Final Report 40.
10. Diana Hicks. (2012) Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy 41.2, pp. 251-261.
11. Jacob, M. and Meek L. (2012) Scientific mobility and international research networks: trends and policy tools for promoting research excellence and capacity building. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), pp. 331-344
12. Iain Chalmers et al. (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet 383.9912, pp. 156-165.
13. Heitor Manuel, Hugo Horta, and Joana Mendonça. (2014) Developing human capital and research capacity: science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82, pp. 6-22.
14. Padilla-Pérez, R. and Gaudin, Y. (2014) Science, technology and innovation policies in small and developing economies: The case of Central America. Research Policy, 43pp. 749-759.
Downloads
Published
18-05-2017
How to Cite
Phuong, N. T. (2017). Some viewpoints on science and technology reform: Issues to be considered when making science and technology policy. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 5(2), 24–36. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/126
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
