Entrepreneurial universities for science and technology: Cases of KAIST and POSTECH


  • Mun-su Park
  • Seung Ouk Jeong


University entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial research university, Technology innovation, Industry university cooperation, Regional innovation


The entrepreneurial university concept is a new challenge and opportunity for science and technology (S&T) universities in Korea. The traditional university functions of education, research, and community service are still highly relevant, but increasingly so are new types of collaboration for research outcomes and funding resources. Strategic university management is needed to handle socioeconomic contribution, involving the creation and maintenance of proactive relationships with firms, national and regional governments, and other regional entities. The emergence of the entrepreneurial university in Korea is similar to the socioeconomic changes observable in the history of university development in America and in many other developed countries. In this paper, we examine the emerging paradigm of entrepreneurial universities in Korea and discuss the interactions among universities, firms, and government strategy and policy by investigating and comparing two universities, POSTECH and KAIST, in their leadership, adaptation to changes in the environment, business strategies, organization, and cooperative network. We conclude with policy points that emphasize the fact that while entrepreneurial universities are an emerging concept, they can expand innovation and creativity in education and research in Korean universities in the mid-to-long term if university administration, policymakers and public administrators, and regional innovation actors take an interest in the need for a new organization and system where university research can contribute socioeconomically.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Smilor, R. W., Gibson. D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1993) The entrepreneurial university: The role of higher education in the United States in technology commercialization and economic development. International Social Science Journal, 45(1).
2. Duderstadt, J. (2000) University for the 21st Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001) Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 81-100.
4. Hong, S., Lee, D., Shin, D., & Lee, E. (2002) A study on the development and current status of the research system in universities in advanced countries. (STEPI research paper 2002-03). Seoul: STEPI.
5. Chesbrough, H. (2003) Open inovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Friedman, J., & Silberman. J. (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
7. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, J. Z. (2004) Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firms formation.Regional Studies, 38(8), 879-891.
8. Looy, V. B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2004) Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and
reciprocal Mathew effect? Research Policy 33(3), 425-441.
9. Byun, D. Y. (2005) Study on university type and its concepts and indicators development. Seoul: The Ministry of Education
10. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? Research Policy, 34.
11. Linda, M. R., & Lori, A. C. (2006) Applying adaptive leadership to successful change initiatives in academia. Leadership &Organization Development Journal.
28 (4), 326-335.
12. Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2007) University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial andcorporate change 16(4), 691-791.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (2008) The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. NY; Abingdon: Routledge.
14. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). (2010) AUTM licensing activity surveys 2010. DATA SET.
15. Lee, J. (2010) Financial structure of university in USA. (KEDI research paper 2009-15). Seoul: KEDI.
16. The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF). (2010) University-Industry collaboration white paper. Daejeon: NRF.
17. Altbach, G. P., & Salmi, J. (2011) The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. TheWorld Bank Publications. 2357.
18. Kim, H., Hong, S., Um, M, Kim, E., & Choi, J. (2011) Analysis of university faculty members’ collaborations with industries in Korea: Policy implications for promoting University-Industry links. (STEPI research paper 2011-3). Seoul: STEPI.
19. Astebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012) Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship. Research policy, 41(4), 663-677.
20. Jang, J. (2012, June) Triple-helix model: KAIST. Paper presented at ASIA TripleHelix conference. Seoul, Korea.
21. KAIST (n.d). About KAIST. Retrieved on December 16, 2012 from www.kaist.edu. Kim, D., Kwon, Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, I. (2010). Talk to new university. Minimum
22. Kwok, S., Kim, K., Lee, M., Jeong, J., & Choi, J. (2012) Smart capitalism 5.0. Paju, Korea: Nanam.
23. Ministry of education, science and technology (MEST). (2012) Press release ofuniversity-industry collaboration Accomplishment.
24. Na, J. (2012, December 5) POSTECH seeks new leap forward. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2013/06/181_126270.html
25. Park, J. (2012, September 4) POSTECH’s president Kim will focus on excellence. No Cut News. Retrieved from http://www.nocutnews.co.kr/show.asp?idx=2246870 Park, M., Shon, H., & Lee, H. (2012) Classification of the subcontracting companies accompanied by R & D capabilities compare and research. Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, 8(2), 121-150.
26. POSTECH (n. d.). POSTECH facts and figures. Retrieved on December 16, 2012 from www.postech.ac.kr POSTECH. (2009) POSTECH history in 20 years. Pohang: POSTECH Publisher. Pounder, J. S. (2001) The New leadership and university organizational effectiveness: exploring the relationship.Leadership & Organizational Development, 22(6), 281-290.
27. Scott, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2012) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of ManagementReview, 25(1), 217-226.
28. Time Higher Education (n.d). The 100 under 50 universities 2013. Retrieved on January 12, 2014 from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/worlduniversityrankings/2013/one-hundred-under-fifty/methodology.



How to Cite

Park, M.- su, & Jeong, S. O. (2017). Entrepreneurial universities for science and technology: Cases of KAIST and POSTECH. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 4(4), 89–105. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/178