Analysis of methods to assess the technological level and capabilities with suitable application for Vietnam condition
Keywords:
Technological level, Technological capability, Technology absorption, Technology innovation, Evaluation method, Set of indicators for evaluationAbstract
Assessing the technological level and technological capability in manufacturing sectors are always very important for enterprises in the process of technology application and innovation as well as for state management agencies in managing science and technology activities in various industrial areas. Through the clarification of basic concepts related to technological level, technological capability and their assessment as well as analysis of science and technology evaluation methods, the authors have clarified the theoretical basis to assess technological level and technological capability in manufacturing sectors. Analyzing the experiences in evaluating technological level and technological capability of other countries in the world and that in Vietnam, the authors have clarified the practical basis from which to propose the method to evaluate technological level and technological capability applicable to the conditions of Vietnam. The proposed method and set of criteria for evaluating technological level and technological capability have been piloted and these results will create the basis for drafting the Circular guiding the assessment of technological level and technological capability in manufacturing sectors in Vietnam.
Code: 19110401
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Tiếng Việt:
1. Tạ Bá Hưng (chủ biên) (1997). Atlas Công nghệ. Tập 1. Nguyên lý phát triển dựa trên cơ sở công nghệ. Trung tâm Thông tin Tư liệu KH&CN Quốc gia.
2. Nguyễn Thị Thu Hằng (2001). Tài liệu môn học Quản lý công nghệ. Khoa Quản lý Công nghiệp, Trường Đại học Bách Khoa Tp.HCM.
3. Phan Tú Anh (2006). Giáo trình Quản lý Công nghệ, Học viện Công nghệ Bưu Chính viễzn thông.
4. Nguyễn Mạnh Ẩm, Trần Văn Minh, Đặng Tuấn Hùng và cs (2006). Điều tra, đánh giá và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu về trình độ công nghệ trên địa bàn tỉnh Quảng Ninh. Nhiệm vụ cấp Bộ. Trung tâm Kỹ thuật TC-ĐL-CL 1, Tổng cục TC-ĐL-CL.
5. Trần Văn Dũng, Hà Đăng Hiển, Hoàng Lâm, Trần Đình Giai (2006). Điều tra, đánh giá và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu trình độ công nghệ các ngành sản xuất công nghiệp trên địa bàn thành phố Đà Nẵng. Nhiệm vụ cấp Quốc gia. Trung tâm kỹ thuật TC-ĐL-CL 3, Bộ Khoa học và Công nghệ.
6. Trần Văn Bình, Phạm Minh Tuấn, Bùi Xuân Hồi và cs (2007). Điều tra đánh giá hiện trạng, xây dựng định hướng chiến lược và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu về hiện trạng công nghệ trên địa bàn thành phố Hải Phòng. Nhiệm vụ cấp Quốc gia. Đại học Bách khoa Hà Nội.
7. Nguyễn Hữu Đồng, Phan Thanh Nghiệm, Phùng Thị Hoa và cs (2016). Điều tra, đánh giá trình độ công nghệ sản xuất và đề xuất các giải pháp đổi mới công nghệ trên địa bàn tỉnh. Nhiệm vụ cấp Tỉnh. Sở Khoa học và Công nghệ Quảng Bình.
Tiếng Anh:
8. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JAPAN. “Science and Technology Trends - Quarterly Review Science & Technology Foresight Center”.
9. UNESCO (1977). “Guild to the Collection of Statistics on Science and Technology”, Paris.
10. UNESCO (1977). “Manual for Surveying National Scientific and Technology Potential”, Paris.
11. UNESCO (1984). “Manual on the National Budgeting of Scientific and Technological Activities”, Paris Unesco.
12. Fabian Y. (1984). “The OECD International S&T Indicators System”, Science and Public Policy, No 11, pp. 4-6.
13. Pavitt K. (1984). “R&D Patenting and Innovative Activities: A statistical Exploration”, Research Policy, No 11 pp. 33-35.
14. Sharif M.N. (1986). “Management of Technology for National Development”, in Technology Forecasting and Social Change, n. 29, pp. 119-172; et Sharif M.N. (1995): “Intergrating Business and Technology Strategies in Developing Countries, In Technology Forecasting and Social Change, n.45, pp. 195-167.
15. Dahlman, Carl J., Bruce Ross-Larson, and Larry E. Westphal (1987). “Managing Technological Development: Lessons from Newly Industrializing Countries,” World Development, 15(6): 759-75.
16. UN-ESCAP (1989). “Technology Atlas Project Tokyo Program on Technology for Development in Asia and Pacific”, Bangalore, India.
17. Abo, Tesuo ed. (1994). Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Bell, Martin, and Keith Pavitt (1995). “The Development of Technological Capabilities” in Irfan ul Hague ed., Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, EDI Development Studies, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
19. Kim, Linsu (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Fujimoto, Takahiro (2001). Seisan Manejimento Nyumon (Introduction to Production Management) I, II, Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc.
21. Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey, Raphael Kaplinsky, and Timothy Sturgeon (2001). “Introduction: Globalisation, Value Chains and Development,” IDS Bulletin, 32(3): 1-8.
22. Figueiredo, Paulo N. (2002). “Does Technological Learning Pay Off? Inter-Firm Differences in Technological Capability-Accumulation Paths and Operational Performance Improvement,” Research Policy, 31: 73-94.
23. Bazan, Luiza and Lizbeth Navas-Aleman (2004). “The Underground Revolution in the Sinos Valley: a Comparison of Upgrading in Global and National Value Chains” in Hubert Schmitz ed.
24. Kim, Linsu (2004). “The Multifaceted Evolution of Korean Technological Capabilities and its Implications for Contemporary Policy,” Oxford Development Studies, 32(3), 341-363.
25. Kishimoto, Chikashi (2004). “Clustering and Upgrading in Global Value Chains: the Taiwanese Personal Computer Industry” in Schmitz ed.
26. Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey and Timothy Sturgeon (2005). “The Governance of Global Value Chains,” Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78-104.
27. Sturgeon, Timothy and Ji-Ren Lee (2005). “Industry Co-Evolution: A Comparison of Taiwan and North American Contract Manufacturers” in Suzanne Berger and Richard Keith Lester eds. Global Taiwan: building competitive strengths in a new international economy, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
28. Fujimoto, Takahiro (2007). Competing to Be Really, REALLY Good: The behind-the-scenes drama of capability-building competition in the automobile industry, Tokyo: International House of Japan.
29. Kawakami, Momoko and Timothy Sturgeon eds. (2010). The Dynamics of Local Learning in Global Value Chains: Experiences from East Asia, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
1. Tạ Bá Hưng (chủ biên) (1997). Atlas Công nghệ. Tập 1. Nguyên lý phát triển dựa trên cơ sở công nghệ. Trung tâm Thông tin Tư liệu KH&CN Quốc gia.
2. Nguyễn Thị Thu Hằng (2001). Tài liệu môn học Quản lý công nghệ. Khoa Quản lý Công nghiệp, Trường Đại học Bách Khoa Tp.HCM.
3. Phan Tú Anh (2006). Giáo trình Quản lý Công nghệ, Học viện Công nghệ Bưu Chính viễzn thông.
4. Nguyễn Mạnh Ẩm, Trần Văn Minh, Đặng Tuấn Hùng và cs (2006). Điều tra, đánh giá và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu về trình độ công nghệ trên địa bàn tỉnh Quảng Ninh. Nhiệm vụ cấp Bộ. Trung tâm Kỹ thuật TC-ĐL-CL 1, Tổng cục TC-ĐL-CL.
5. Trần Văn Dũng, Hà Đăng Hiển, Hoàng Lâm, Trần Đình Giai (2006). Điều tra, đánh giá và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu trình độ công nghệ các ngành sản xuất công nghiệp trên địa bàn thành phố Đà Nẵng. Nhiệm vụ cấp Quốc gia. Trung tâm kỹ thuật TC-ĐL-CL 3, Bộ Khoa học và Công nghệ.
6. Trần Văn Bình, Phạm Minh Tuấn, Bùi Xuân Hồi và cs (2007). Điều tra đánh giá hiện trạng, xây dựng định hướng chiến lược và xây dựng cơ sở dữ liệu về hiện trạng công nghệ trên địa bàn thành phố Hải Phòng. Nhiệm vụ cấp Quốc gia. Đại học Bách khoa Hà Nội.
7. Nguyễn Hữu Đồng, Phan Thanh Nghiệm, Phùng Thị Hoa và cs (2016). Điều tra, đánh giá trình độ công nghệ sản xuất và đề xuất các giải pháp đổi mới công nghệ trên địa bàn tỉnh. Nhiệm vụ cấp Tỉnh. Sở Khoa học và Công nghệ Quảng Bình.
Tiếng Anh:
8. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JAPAN. “Science and Technology Trends - Quarterly Review Science & Technology Foresight Center”.
9. UNESCO (1977). “Guild to the Collection of Statistics on Science and Technology”, Paris.
10. UNESCO (1977). “Manual for Surveying National Scientific and Technology Potential”, Paris.
11. UNESCO (1984). “Manual on the National Budgeting of Scientific and Technological Activities”, Paris Unesco.
12. Fabian Y. (1984). “The OECD International S&T Indicators System”, Science and Public Policy, No 11, pp. 4-6.
13. Pavitt K. (1984). “R&D Patenting and Innovative Activities: A statistical Exploration”, Research Policy, No 11 pp. 33-35.
14. Sharif M.N. (1986). “Management of Technology for National Development”, in Technology Forecasting and Social Change, n. 29, pp. 119-172; et Sharif M.N. (1995): “Intergrating Business and Technology Strategies in Developing Countries, In Technology Forecasting and Social Change, n.45, pp. 195-167.
15. Dahlman, Carl J., Bruce Ross-Larson, and Larry E. Westphal (1987). “Managing Technological Development: Lessons from Newly Industrializing Countries,” World Development, 15(6): 759-75.
16. UN-ESCAP (1989). “Technology Atlas Project Tokyo Program on Technology for Development in Asia and Pacific”, Bangalore, India.
17. Abo, Tesuo ed. (1994). Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Bell, Martin, and Keith Pavitt (1995). “The Development of Technological Capabilities” in Irfan ul Hague ed., Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, EDI Development Studies, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
19. Kim, Linsu (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Fujimoto, Takahiro (2001). Seisan Manejimento Nyumon (Introduction to Production Management) I, II, Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc.
21. Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey, Raphael Kaplinsky, and Timothy Sturgeon (2001). “Introduction: Globalisation, Value Chains and Development,” IDS Bulletin, 32(3): 1-8.
22. Figueiredo, Paulo N. (2002). “Does Technological Learning Pay Off? Inter-Firm Differences in Technological Capability-Accumulation Paths and Operational Performance Improvement,” Research Policy, 31: 73-94.
23. Bazan, Luiza and Lizbeth Navas-Aleman (2004). “The Underground Revolution in the Sinos Valley: a Comparison of Upgrading in Global and National Value Chains” in Hubert Schmitz ed.
24. Kim, Linsu (2004). “The Multifaceted Evolution of Korean Technological Capabilities and its Implications for Contemporary Policy,” Oxford Development Studies, 32(3), 341-363.
25. Kishimoto, Chikashi (2004). “Clustering and Upgrading in Global Value Chains: the Taiwanese Personal Computer Industry” in Schmitz ed.
26. Gereffi, Gary, John Humphrey and Timothy Sturgeon (2005). “The Governance of Global Value Chains,” Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78-104.
27. Sturgeon, Timothy and Ji-Ren Lee (2005). “Industry Co-Evolution: A Comparison of Taiwan and North American Contract Manufacturers” in Suzanne Berger and Richard Keith Lester eds. Global Taiwan: building competitive strengths in a new international economy, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
28. Fujimoto, Takahiro (2007). Competing to Be Really, REALLY Good: The behind-the-scenes drama of capability-building competition in the automobile industry, Tokyo: International House of Japan.
29. Kawakami, Momoko and Timothy Sturgeon eds. (2010). The Dynamics of Local Learning in Global Value Chains: Experiences from East Asia, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
03-10-2019
How to Cite
Hai, N. N., Hoang, N. D., & Tung, N. K. (2019). Analysis of methods to assess the technological level and capabilities with suitable application for Vietnam condition. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 8(3), 48–74. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/307
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
