Status of international cooperation activities for science-technology of universities in economic fields in Vietnam
Keywords:
Science-technology, International cooperation, Measuring indicatorAbstract
In trends of internalization of higher education, universities in the world as well as the ones of Vietnam are gradually shifting to a practice of both cooperative-competitive form. Universities get active in international cooperation in science-technology activities because these activities cause direct impacts to their research capabilities. Also the research results developed from international cooperation activities are important indicators for ranking of universities. Therefore, the paper provides: (i) academic presentation of indicators to measure international cooperation activities of universities for science-technology, and (ii) analysis of the status of international cooperation activities of universities in economic fields in Vietnam.
Code: 19090201
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Narin, F., et al, (1991). “Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers”, Scientometrics , 21(3), 313-323.
2. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G., (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 101-126.
3. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R., (1997). “What is research collaboration?”, Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
4. Laudel, G. (2001). “Collaboration, Creativity and Rewards: Why and How Scientists Collaborate”, International Journal of Technology Management, 22 (7/8): 762-781.
5. Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001), “Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations”, Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730.
6. Meyer, M. and S. Bhattacharya (2004). “Commonalities and Differences Between Scholarly and Technical Collaboration”, Scientometrics 61(3): 443-456.
7. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). “Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital”. Research Policy, 34 (3), 349-367.
8. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102, no. 46: 16569-16572.
9. Barré, R. (2006). Towards a European STI Indicators Platform (ESTIP), Position paper, presented and discussed at the second PRIME annual conference, Paris .
10. D’Este, P., & Patel, P., (2007). “University - industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?” Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
11. Lepori, B., Barré R., Filliatreau, G. (2008). “New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of STI indicators”, Research Evaluation, 17(1), pp.33-44.
12. Carayannis E., Campbell D., F., J., (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3/4): 201-234.
13. Gnamus, A., (2009). Comparative Report on S&T Cooperation of the ERA Countries with Brazil, India and Russia, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 25022 EN. <http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/export/sites/default/
galleries/generic_files/file_0101.pdf> accessed 15 March 2012.
14. Edler, J., Flanagan, K. (2011). “Indicator needs for the internationalization of science policies”, Research Evaluation, March 2011 20(1), 7-17.
15. Bozeman, B., Boardman, C., (2014). Research Collaboration and Team Science, Springer ISBN 978-3-319-06468-0 (eBook)
16. Isiordia - Lachica P, et al (2015). Measurement of scientific research performance at the Universidad de Sonora, Mexico Porland international conference on manage-
ment of engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE; August.
p. 204-210.
17. Chen et al (2016). “International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research”, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 5:1 DOI 10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z.
18. https://login.webofknowledge.com
19. http://www.ftu.edu.vn/
20. https://www.neu.edu.vn/
21. http://ueb.edu.vn/.
2. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G., (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 101-126.
3. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R., (1997). “What is research collaboration?”, Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
4. Laudel, G. (2001). “Collaboration, Creativity and Rewards: Why and How Scientists Collaborate”, International Journal of Technology Management, 22 (7/8): 762-781.
5. Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001), “Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations”, Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730.
6. Meyer, M. and S. Bhattacharya (2004). “Commonalities and Differences Between Scholarly and Technical Collaboration”, Scientometrics 61(3): 443-456.
7. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). “Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital”. Research Policy, 34 (3), 349-367.
8. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102, no. 46: 16569-16572.
9. Barré, R. (2006). Towards a European STI Indicators Platform (ESTIP), Position paper, presented and discussed at the second PRIME annual conference, Paris .
10. D’Este, P., & Patel, P., (2007). “University - industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?” Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
11. Lepori, B., Barré R., Filliatreau, G. (2008). “New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of STI indicators”, Research Evaluation, 17(1), pp.33-44.
12. Carayannis E., Campbell D., F., J., (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3/4): 201-234.
13. Gnamus, A., (2009). Comparative Report on S&T Cooperation of the ERA Countries with Brazil, India and Russia, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 25022 EN. <http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/export/sites/default/
galleries/generic_files/file_0101.pdf> accessed 15 March 2012.
14. Edler, J., Flanagan, K. (2011). “Indicator needs for the internationalization of science policies”, Research Evaluation, March 2011 20(1), 7-17.
15. Bozeman, B., Boardman, C., (2014). Research Collaboration and Team Science, Springer ISBN 978-3-319-06468-0 (eBook)
16. Isiordia - Lachica P, et al (2015). Measurement of scientific research performance at the Universidad de Sonora, Mexico Porland international conference on manage-
ment of engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE; August.
p. 204-210.
17. Chen et al (2016). “International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research”, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 5:1 DOI 10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z.
18. https://login.webofknowledge.com
19. http://www.ftu.edu.vn/
20. https://www.neu.edu.vn/
21. http://ueb.edu.vn/.
Downloads
Published
03-10-2019
How to Cite
Long, D. T. T. (2019). Status of international cooperation activities for science-technology of universities in economic fields in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 8(3), 91–105. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/309
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
