Some issues on stakeholder engagement in science technology and innovation policymaking processes for sustainable development goals
Keywords:
Science and technology, Innovation, Policy, PolicymakingAbstract
In the context that the world is facing social challenges and rapidly increasing uncertainty, researchers on science technology and innovation (STI) policy are concerned with building STI policies capable of orienting innovation, mitigating socio-technical constraints, promoting resilience and prevent risks, uncertainty and ignorance. In order to develop STI policies that meet these requirements, participation and cooperation among stakeholders in the STI policymaking process plays an increasingly important role. This article aims to overview some issues of stakeholder participation in the STI policymaking process and propose some contents that need attention for research in the coming time on the engagement of stakeholders in the policymaking process in Vietnam.
Code: 23092601
Downloads
References
OECD (2019). Government at a Glance 2019
OECD (2001a). Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making, OECD, Paris.
UN (2022). Science, Technology and Innovation for Achieving the SDGs: Guidelines for Policy Formulation.
UNCTAD (2019). A Framework for Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Reviews Harnessing innovation for sustainable development.
Amy A. Lemke, Julie N. Harris-Wai (2015). Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics, Genetics in Medicine, Volume 17, Number 12, December 2015.
Amanatidou E. và cộng sự (2014). “Using evaluation research as a means for policy analysis in a ‘new’ mission-oriented policy context”, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269366218_Using_Evaluation_Research_as_a_Means_for_Policy_Analysis_in_a_%27New%27_Mission_Oriented_Policy_Context>
Brody, S.D. (2003). “Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 407-419.
Burton, R.J.F. (2004). “Reconceptualising the “Behavioural” Approach in Agricultural Studies: A Socio-Psychological Perspective”, Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 359-371.
Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., and Keenan, M. (2012). “Orienting European Innovation Systems towards Grand Challenges and the Roles that FTA Can Play”. Science and Public Policy 39, 140-152.
Charles O. Jones. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1984.
Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). “Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm”. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Garry D. Brewer (1974). “The Policy Science Emerge: To Nurture and Structure a Discipline”. Policy Science 5 (1974), pp. 239-244.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.
Harold D. Lasswell (1956). The Decision Process: Seven Catelogies of Functional Analysis, College Park, University of Maryland.
K.L. Blackstock, G.J. Kelly, B.L. Horsey (2007). “Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability”, Ecological Economics, Volume 60, Issue 4, 1 February 2007, pp. 726-742.
S. Kuhlmann, A. Rip (2018). “Next-generation innovation policy and Grand Challenges”, Sci. Public Policy, 45 (2018), pp. 448-454.
Markus Grillitsch (2019). “Innovation policy for system-wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden”, Research Policy, Volume 48, Issue 4, May 2019, pp. 1048-1061.
Matsui, Takanori & Suzuki, Kanoko & Ando, Kyota & Kitai, Yuya & Haga, Chihiro & Masuhara, Naoki & Kawakubo, Shun. (2022). A Natural Language Processing Model for Supporting Sustainable Development Goals: Translating Semantics, Visualizing Nexus, and Connecting Stakeholders. Sustainability Science. 10.1007/s11625-022-01093-3.
Michael Howlett (2019). Designing Public Policies-Principles and Instruments, 2nd Edition, London.
Pisano Umberto, Lisa K. Lange, Katrin Lepuschitz and Gerald Berger (2015). “The role of stakeholder participation in European sustainable development policies and strategies”, ESDN Quarterly Report No 39.
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567.
J. Schot, L. Kanger (2018). “Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality”, Res. Policy 2018.
Thomas A.Birkland (2011). An Introduction to the Policy Process Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making.
William N. Dunn: Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, 2007, p.46
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
