Monitoring and evaluation the implementation the strategy anh policy on science, technology and innovation in some countries in the world
Keywords:
Science and technology, Innovation, Strategy, Policy, Monitoring, EvaluationAbstract
Monitoring and evaluation the implementation of science, technology and innovation strategy and policy is an important task, which contributing to ensuring that the implementation of programs, projects, policy and strategy is implemented effectively and sustainably. The monitoring and evaluation framework is a tool designed to guide the implementation of monitoring and evaluation functions during the implementation of strategy and policy in order to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of strategies and policies in practice, meeting defined objectives. This article reviews experiences in monitoring and evaluating the implementation of science, technology and innovation strategy and policy in some countries, thereby suggesting some lessons learned for Vietnam.
Code: 23120401
Downloads
References
Trần Thuỳ Phương, Trần Anh Đức (2022). “Sức mạnh khoa học - công nghệ của Iran”. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Ấn Độ và Châu Á, số 5 (114) tháng 5-2022.
European Commision Staff Working Document (2023). Evidence Framework on monitoring and evaluation of Horizon Europe, Brussels.
OECD, Monitoring and evaluating the strategic plan of Nuevo Leon 2015-2030: Using evidence to achieve sustainable development, <https://web-archive.oecd.org/2021-04-27/586227-OECD-Highlights-Nuevo-León-EN.pdf>
The National Advisory Council on Innovation (NACI) (2020). Monitoring and evaluation framework for The South African science, technology and innovation system, Pretoria.
UNDP (2009). Hanbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP (2002). Handbook on monitoring and evaluating for results. United Nations Development Programme Evaluation Office, New York.
UNDP (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results, United Nations Development Programme Evaluation Office, New York.
Gibbons, M. & Georghiou, L. (1987). Evaluation of research: a selection of current practices. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Washington, D.C: OECD Publications and Information Centre. ISBN: 9264129812
Leila Namdarian (2017). “Evaluation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) in Iran”, COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, DOI: 10.1080/09737766.2017.1321728.
Molas, J. & Davies, A. (2006). “Toward Theory-Led Evaluation The Experience of European Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies”. American Journal of Evaluation. 27. 10.1177/1098214005281701.
Kusek, J., and Rist, R., (2004). Ten Steps to a Results-based Monitoring and Evaluation System, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
