Korean innovation model, revisited
Keywords:
Korean innovation model, Dynamic capabilities, Catch up, Path-revealing, Collective creationAbstract
Over the last decade, some Korean enterprises have emerged to become global players in their specialized products. How have they achieved such tremendous technological progress in a short period of time? This paper explores that question by examining the characteristics of technological innovation activities at major Korean enterprises.
The paper begins with a brief review of the stages of economic growth and science and technology development in Korea. Then, the existing literature, explaining the Korean innovation model, is analyzed in order to establish a new framework for the Korean innovation model. Specifically, Korean firms have experienced three sequential phases, and thus, the Korean model, at the firm level, can be coined as “path-following,” “path-revealing,” and “path-creating.” Then, the stylized facts in the first phase (path-following) and the second phase (path-revealing) are discussed, in the context of empirical evidence from the areas of memory chips, automobiles, shipbuilding, and steel.
In terms of technology development, the Korean model has evolved as “collective learning” in the first phase, “collective recombination” of existing knowledge and technology in the second phase, and is assumed as “collective creativity” in the third phase. Ultimately, all three can be classified as “collective creation”.
Korean firms now face a transition in the modes of technological innovation in order to efficiently implement the third phase. To achieve remarkable progress again, as they did in the past, and to sustain the growth momentum, Korean firms should challenge new dimensions such as creative technological ideas, distinctive technological capabilities, and unique innovation systems - all of which connote ‘uniqueness’. Finally, some lessons from the Korean technological innovation experience are addressed.
Downloads
References
2. Choi, Y. (1996) Dynamic Techno-management Capability: The Case of Samsung Semiconductor Sector in Korea. Aldershot, Avebury.
3. Choi et al. (1986) Evolution of Science and Technology System in Korea. (in Korean), Seoul: STEPI Research Report.
4. Choi et al. (1997) A History of Korea’s Science and Technology Policy: 1945-1995. (in Korean), Seoul: STEPI Research Report.
5. Choi et al. (2008) In search of New Framework on Korean Innovation Model. (in Korean), Seoul: National Academy of Engineering of Korea.
6. Dahlman et al. (1987) Managing Technological Development: Lessons from the Newly Industrializing Countries. World Development, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 759-775.
7. Hobday et al. (2004) Approaching the Innovation Frontier in Korea: The Transition Phase to Leadership. Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 1433-1457.
8. Kim, L. (1980) Stages of Development of Industrial Technology in a Less Developed Country: A Model. Research Policy , Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 254-277
9. Kim, L. (1999) Building Technological Capability for Industrialization: Analytical Frameworks and Korea’s Experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 8, No.1, pp. 111-136.
10. Kim, L. (1997) Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. KITA (The Korea International Trade Association). The Top Ten Export Items in Korea. (in Korean), KITA, Seoul, each year.
12. Lee et al. (1988) Technology Development Processes: A Model for a Developing Country with a Global Perspective. R&D Management, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 235-250.
13. Lee et al. (2008) Paths-creating Capability of Leading Industries in Korea. (in Korean), Seoul: STEPI Research Report,
14. Lee, K. and C. Lim. (2001) Technological Regimes, Catching-up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries. Research Policy, Vol. 30 (3), pp. 459-483.
15. MKE (Ministry of Knowledge and Economy). (2009) No.1 Items of World Market Share. (in Korean), Seoul.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).