Some evaluation methods for R&D projects and application orientations
Keywords:
Project, R&D, Evaluation, BSC, DEAAbstract
Research and development (R&D) works have very high roles for sustainable development of organizations and enterprises. Therefore, R&D projects are established and implemented with diversified forms. With limited resources and prefixed development orientations, however, they should be evaluated in an adequate way. Various evaluation methods and models were proposed by scientists, each of them have its own strong points and weak ones. This report presents two methods popularly used and the combined one of them for a better integrated evaluation purpose. One of the purposes of this report is to combine qualitative indicators with variables in an optimal model. However, since the new model just passed some low scaled pilot works its weak points were not exploded. Therefore, the further steps targeted by the author are to test the methods for projects of larger scale to get a multi-aspect vision to the obtained results.
Code: 13092601
Downloads
References
1. B? V?n hóa, Th? thao và Du l?ch. (2010) Thông t? s? 05/2010/TT-BVHTTDL quy ??nh vi?c xét duy?t ?? tài KH&CN, d? án s?n xu?t th? nghi?m c?a B? V?n hóa, Th? thao và Du l?ch.
2. B? Khoa h?c và Công ngh?. (2013) Thông t? s? 12/2013/TT-BKHCN H??ng d?n vi?c xét duy?t, th?m ??nh và phê duy?t D? án KH&CN phát tri?n s?n ph?m qu?c gia.
3. Ph?m Th? Qu?nh. (2012) ??i m?i quy trình xét duy?t ?? tài nghiên c?u khoa h?c theo ??nh h??ng nhu c?u nh?m g?n k?t nghiên c?u v?i th?c ti?n t?i Thái Bình. Lu?n v?n th?c s? chuyên ngành Qu?n lý KH&CN, ??i h?c KHXH&NV - ??i h?c Qu?c gia Hà N?i.
Ti?ng Anh:
4. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
5. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A. Lewin, L.M. Seiford. (1994) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. M. Oral, O. Kettani, P. Lang. (1991) A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science 1991;37(7):871-85.
7. Y. Roll, W. Cook, B. Golany. (1991) Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Transactions;23(1):2-9.
8. W. D. Cook, M. Kress, L.M. Seiford. (1993) On the use of ordinal data in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 133-140.
9. R.S. a lan, D.P. orton, and P?ter Hor ?th. (1996) The balanced scorecard. Vol. 6. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10. A.D. Henriksen, A.J. Traynor. (1999) A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management;46(2):158-70.
11. W.E. Stewart. (2001) Balanced scorecard for projects. Project Management Journal; 32(1):38-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
