Some factors affecting scientific reserch activities of universities in Vietnam
Keywords:
Scientific research activity, University, FactorAbstract
Each university has an assignment to perform three important missions: teaching, scientific research and social services. To improve their position, universities have different action plans to best develop these missions. Scientific research activity in universities needs to be particularly focused and developed simultaneously with teaching and social services. This is especially true for universities in developing countries as Vietnam. However, what are the key factors that may affect the university’s scientific research activity? The paper analyzes and clarifies some factors that may affect the university’s scientific research activity in Vietnam.
Code: 20080501
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Tiếng Việt
1. Phạm Thị Ly (2014). Nhìn từ vụ việc của đại học Hùng Vương: Khoảng trống về chính sách. Kinh tế Sài Gòn, số 9-1-2014.
2. Vũ Cao Đàm (2014). Nghịch lý và lối thoát: bàn về triết lý phát triển Khoa học và Giáo dục Việt Nam, NXb. Thế giới, Hà Nội.
3. Hoàng Văn Tuyên, Nguyễn Thị Minh Nga (2015). “Đại học nghiên cứu: một số đặc trưng cơ bản”. Tạp chí Chính sách và Quản lý Khoa học và Công nghệ. Tập 4, số 2.
Tiếng Anh
4. Blackburn R T, Bieber J P, Lawrence J H & Trautveter L (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship and service, Research in Higher Educaton, 32(4), pp. 385-413.
5. Bland C J, Seaquist E, Pacala J T, Center B & Finstad D (2002). One school’s strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, 77(5), pp.368-376.
6. Crescenzi R, Filippetti A and Iammarino S (2017). Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry, Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer US, 42(4), pp. 730-762. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-016-9550-z.
7. Creswell J W (1985). Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educaton Report No.4, 1985. Associaton for the Study of Higher Educaton, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Department PR-4, Washington, DC 20036.
8. Dao Van Khanh & Hayden M (2010). Reforming the Governance of higher education in Vietnam, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
9. Dundar H & Lewis D R (1998). Determinants of research productvity in higher educaton, Research in Higher Educaton, 39(6), pp.607-631.
10. Fadel C (2014). Expotential Technologies and their impact on human kind. Center for Curriculum Redesign, <https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/Geneva-Keynote-Impact-of-Technology-Charles-Fadel.pdf>
11. Giones F (2019). University-industry collaborations: an industry perspective, Management Decision, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1108/MD-11-2018-1182.
12. Goldin C & Katz L (2009). The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials. Harvard University Press: USA, pp 1890-2005.
13. Hayden M & Lam Quang Thiep (2010). Vietnam’s Higher Education System, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
14. Jung J (2012). Faculty research productvity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Educaton Studies, 2(4), pp.1-13.
15. Kyvik S (1995). Are big university departments beter than small ones? Higher Educaton 30(3), pp.295-304.
16. OECD (2007). Frascati Manual: Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the frascati manual, Paris.
17. Oya TAMTEKİN AYDIN (2017), Research Performance of Higher Education Institutions: A Review on the Measurements and Afecting Factors of Research Performance, Journal of Higher Educaton and Science, Volume 7 (2), August 2017, pp. 312-320.
18. Ramsden P (1994). Describing and explaining research productvity, Higher Educaton, 28(2), pp.207-226.
19. Reddy R (2011). The Evolving of Universities in Economic Development: the Case of University-Industry linkages, in Görannson B & Brundenius C (eds.), Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions. Springer.
20. Wamala R & Ssembatya V A (2015). Productvity in academia: An assessment of causal linkages between output and outcome indicators. Quality Assurance in Educaton, 23(2), pp.184-195.
21. Wood F (1990). Factors infuencing research performance of university academic staf. Higher Educaton, 19(1), pp.81-100.
1. Phạm Thị Ly (2014). Nhìn từ vụ việc của đại học Hùng Vương: Khoảng trống về chính sách. Kinh tế Sài Gòn, số 9-1-2014.
2. Vũ Cao Đàm (2014). Nghịch lý và lối thoát: bàn về triết lý phát triển Khoa học và Giáo dục Việt Nam, NXb. Thế giới, Hà Nội.
3. Hoàng Văn Tuyên, Nguyễn Thị Minh Nga (2015). “Đại học nghiên cứu: một số đặc trưng cơ bản”. Tạp chí Chính sách và Quản lý Khoa học và Công nghệ. Tập 4, số 2.
Tiếng Anh
4. Blackburn R T, Bieber J P, Lawrence J H & Trautveter L (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship and service, Research in Higher Educaton, 32(4), pp. 385-413.
5. Bland C J, Seaquist E, Pacala J T, Center B & Finstad D (2002). One school’s strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, 77(5), pp.368-376.
6. Crescenzi R, Filippetti A and Iammarino S (2017). Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry, Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer US, 42(4), pp. 730-762. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-016-9550-z.
7. Creswell J W (1985). Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Educaton Report No.4, 1985. Associaton for the Study of Higher Educaton, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Department PR-4, Washington, DC 20036.
8. Dao Van Khanh & Hayden M (2010). Reforming the Governance of higher education in Vietnam, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
9. Dundar H & Lewis D R (1998). Determinants of research productvity in higher educaton, Research in Higher Educaton, 39(6), pp.607-631.
10. Fadel C (2014). Expotential Technologies and their impact on human kind. Center for Curriculum Redesign, <https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/Geneva-Keynote-Impact-of-Technology-Charles-Fadel.pdf>
11. Giones F (2019). University-industry collaborations: an industry perspective, Management Decision, Forthcoming. doi: 10.1108/MD-11-2018-1182.
12. Goldin C & Katz L (2009). The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of U.S. Educational Wage Differentials. Harvard University Press: USA, pp 1890-2005.
13. Hayden M & Lam Quang Thiep (2010). Vietnam’s Higher Education System, in Harman G, Hayden M and Pham Thanh Nghi (eds.), Reforming Higher Education in Vietnam. Springer.
14. Jung J (2012). Faculty research productvity in Hong Kong across academic discipline. Higher Educaton Studies, 2(4), pp.1-13.
15. Kyvik S (1995). Are big university departments beter than small ones? Higher Educaton 30(3), pp.295-304.
16. OECD (2007). Frascati Manual: Revised field of science and technology (FOS) classification in the frascati manual, Paris.
17. Oya TAMTEKİN AYDIN (2017), Research Performance of Higher Education Institutions: A Review on the Measurements and Afecting Factors of Research Performance, Journal of Higher Educaton and Science, Volume 7 (2), August 2017, pp. 312-320.
18. Ramsden P (1994). Describing and explaining research productvity, Higher Educaton, 28(2), pp.207-226.
19. Reddy R (2011). The Evolving of Universities in Economic Development: the Case of University-Industry linkages, in Görannson B & Brundenius C (eds.), Universities in Transition: The Changing Role and Challenges for Academic Institutions. Springer.
20. Wamala R & Ssembatya V A (2015). Productvity in academia: An assessment of causal linkages between output and outcome indicators. Quality Assurance in Educaton, 23(2), pp.184-195.
21. Wood F (1990). Factors infuencing research performance of university academic staf. Higher Educaton, 19(1), pp.81-100.
Downloads
Published
15-01-2021
How to Cite
Tuyen, H. V. (2021). Some factors affecting scientific reserch activities of universities in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 9(3), 93–104. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/338
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
