Tax policies supporting research activities of non-public research organizations: Overview and policy implications for Vietnam

Authors

  • Nguyen Quynh Anh
  • Nguyen Van Hieu
  • Le Minh Hai
  • Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
  • Dang Thu Minh

Keywords:

Tax, Policies, Non-public organizations, Research and development, Science and technology

Abstract

As Vietnam’s economy expands, the government is adjusting its policies in the field of  science and technology (S&T). These adjustments include privatization to encourage businesses, groups, and individuals to participate in S&T. The policies also permit various organizations and individuals, including those from other countries, to establish and register private S&T institutions in Vietnam. These non-public organizations operating in research and development (R&D) have played a significant role in the country's overall socio-economic development and the progress of S&T. Recognizing their importance, it's essential to have policies that support and enhance the R&D activities of these institutions, aligning with their role in the country's growth. This article examines the gaps in tax policies affecting the support for R&D activities in non-public organizations in Vietnam. It proposes solutions by analyzing these gaps and referring to effective policies from around the world that support R&D activities in non-public organizations.

Code: 24011801

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Đỗ Thành Long (2020). “Một số chính sách đột phá của Israel trong phát triển hệ thống đổi mới và công nghệ”. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Châu Phi & Trung Đông, 04(176), 23-32.

Hà Linh (2023). “Khai thác sáng chế để thúc đẩy đổi mới sáng tạo”. Báo Nhân dân online, ngày 18/05/2023, <https://nhandan.vn/khai-thac-sang-che-de-thuc-day-doi-moi-sang-tao-post753185.html>.

Alstadsæter, A., Barrios, S., Nicodeme, G., Skonieczna, A. M., & Vezzani, A. (2018). "Patent Boxes Design, Patents Location, and Local R&D". Economic Policy, 33(93), 131-177.

Anderson James, E. (1984). Public Policy Making: An Introduction. In. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Bevan, L. D. (2019). Research & Development Policy: An Overview of Key Thinking and Frameworks. UCL Department of Science, Technology, Engineering & Public Policy (STEaPP), London.

Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation". Journal of economic perspectives, 33(3), 163-184.

Birkland, T. A. (2019). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. Routledge.

Böhm, T., Karkinsky, T., Knoll, B., & Riedel, N. (2015). "Corporate Taxes and Strategic Patent Location within Multinational Firms". CESIfo Area Conference on Public Economics,

Bösenberg, S., & Egger, P. H. (2017). "R&D Tax Incentives and The Emergence and Trade of Ideas". Economic Policy, 32(89), 39-80.

Bradley, S., Dauchy, E., & Robinson, L. (2015). "Cross-country Evidence on The Preliminary Effects of Patent Box Regimes on Patent Activity and Ownership". National Tax Journal, 68(4), 1047-1071.

Chavez, E. (2020). The Effects of R&D Tax Credits and Subsidies on Private R&D in Mexico. Paris School of Economics.

Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.

Güçeri, İ., Köthenbürger, M., & Simmler, M. (2020). "Supporting Firm Innovation and R&D: What is the Optimal Policy Mix?" EconPol Policy Report, No. 20, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich.

Haufler, A., & Schindler, D. (2023). "Attracting profit shifting or fostering innovation? On patent boxes and R&D subsidies". European Economic Review, 155, 104446.

Hood, C. (2007). "Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades". Governance, 20(1), 127-144.

Jenkins, W. I. (1978). Policy Analysis: A Political and Organisational Perspective. Martin Robertson.

Karkinsky, T., & Riedel, N. (2012). "Corporate taxation and the choice of patent location within multinational firms". Journal of international Economics, 88(1), 176-185.

OECD (2010). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010. OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2016). Fiscal Incentives for R&D and Innovation in a Diverse World. OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2023a). The Impact of R&D Tax Incentives: Results from the OECD MicroBeRD+ Project. OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2023b). Income-based Tax Relief for R&D and Innovation: An Integrated View. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Ohrn, E. (2016). The Effect of IP Box Regimes on International IP Payments and Foreign Research and Development. Mimeo, Grinnell College.

Schwab, T., & Todtenhaupt, M. (2021). "Thinking outside the box: The cross-border effect of tax cuts on R&D". Journal of Public Economics, 204, 104536.

Bloom, Nicholas, John Van Reenen, and Heidi Williams. 2019. “A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (3): 163-84.

Haufler, A., & Schindler, D. (2023). "Attracting profit shifting or fostering innovation? On patent boxes and R&D subsidies". European Economic Review, 155, 104446.

Published

05-04-2024

How to Cite

Nguyen Quynh Anh, Nguyen Van Hieu, Le Minh Hai, Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, & Dang Thu Minh. (2024). Tax policies supporting research activities of non-public research organizations: Overview and policy implications for Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 13(1), 46–66. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/527

Issue

Section

STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT