International practice, national context and issues for public private partnership in implementation of science and technology tasks in Vietnam
Keywords:
Public Private Partnership, Science, Technology and InnovationAbstract
Public Private Partnership (PPP) in co-financing science and technology (S&T) tasks has been considered by the Party and the State as an important solution to strengthen the linkage between S&T institutions with businesses in the implementation of applied research, technological innovation, human resources development. Research on international practice shows that the concept of PPP has been used in many areas with a very different and confusing meaning. In science, technology and innovation (STI), PPP concept is also used to refer to a diversified public-private interaction. Each specific PPP design depends on the type of issue to be addressed, the context, conditions, cooperative capacity of the parties involved. This article analyzes the international practice of PPP in STI activities, mainly from the US and EU, and based on that, it makes assessment on the context to identify issues of PPP in STI activities appropriate to Vietnam in the next 10-year period.
Code: 16022201
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ti?ng Vi?t
1. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? n?m 2013, Lu?t s? 29/2013/QH13 c?a Qu?c h?i ban hành ngày 18/06/2013.
2. Nguy?n Võ H?ng et al. (2003) Nghiên c?u c? ch? và chính sách phát tri?n th? tr??ng công ngh? ? Vi?t Nam. Báo cáo ?? tài nghiên c?u c?p B?. NISTPASS. Hà N?i.
3. Nguy?n Võ H?ng et al, (2005) Nghiên c?u c? ch? và chính sách khuy?n khích ??i m?i công ngh? ? doanh nghi?p v?a và nh? (SMEs) có v?n nhà n??c. Báo cáo ?? tài nghiên c?u c?p B?. NISTPASS. Hà N?i.
Ti?ng Anh:
4. CBO. (1990) Using R&D Consortia for Commercial Innovation: SEMATECH, X-ray Lithography, and High-Resolution Systems. CBO.
5. EC. (2005) Report on European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives: Forstering Public-Private R&D Partnerships to Boost Europe’s Industrial Competitiveness. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
6. EC. (2009) Mobilising private and public investment for recorvery and long term structural change: developing Public Private Partnerships. Brussels.
7. EC. (2011) Partnering in Research and Innovation. Brussels.
8. EU. (2006) Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demostration activities (2007-2013). Brussels.
9. EU. (2013) Council Decision establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for research and innovation (2014-2020). Brussels.
10. EU. (2013) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 110/2014 on the model financial regulation for public-private partnership bodies referred to in Article 209 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels.
11. OECD. (1998) Science Technology Industry Review No.23: Special Issue on “Public/Private Partnerships in Science and Technology. Paris.
12. USAID. (1998) Partnering for Results: a User’s Guide to Inter-sectoral Partnering. USAID. (1999) Partnering for Results: Vollume II: Assessing the Impact of Intersectoral Partnering.
14. USAID. (2001) Designing and Managing Partnerships Between U.S. and Host – Country Entities. CDIE.
15. World Bank. (2010) Innovation Policy: a Guide for Developing Countries. The World Bank.
16. GTZ. (2015) ASEAN Policy Framework on Public-Private Partnerships for Technology Development and Innovation.
17. Nelson, R., Winter, G.W. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Freman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
19. Lundvall B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
20. Nelson, R. (ed.). (1993) National Innovation Systems. A comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Edquist C. (2005) “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges” in Fagerberg J, Mowery D.C and Nelson R.R (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of
Innovation. Oxford Uninvesity Press.
22. Scotchmer, S. (2005), Innovation and Incentives. The MIT Press. Cambridge.
23. Weimer, D., Vining A.R. (2005) Policy Ananlysis - Concepts and Practice. Pearson Prentice Hall.
24. Yescombe E.R. (2007) Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. Butterworth-Heinemann.
25. Lundvall B.A, Chaminade C. & Vang J. (2009) Handbook of Innovation System in Developing Countries. Edward Elgar.
26. Loxley J. (2010) Public Service Private Profits: the Political Economy of PublicPrivate Partnerships in Canada. Fernwood Publishing. Canada.
27. Soete L., Verpagen B., Weel B.T. (2010) System of Innovation in Hall B.H. and Rosenberg N.(Eds). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vollume 2. Elsevier.
28. Kadura B, Langbein J and Wilde K. (2011) Strenthening Innovation Systems: Foundation, Concept and Strategic Approach. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
29. Schacht W.H. (2011) Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview. Congressional Research Service.
1. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? n?m 2013, Lu?t s? 29/2013/QH13 c?a Qu?c h?i ban hành ngày 18/06/2013.
2. Nguy?n Võ H?ng et al. (2003) Nghiên c?u c? ch? và chính sách phát tri?n th? tr??ng công ngh? ? Vi?t Nam. Báo cáo ?? tài nghiên c?u c?p B?. NISTPASS. Hà N?i.
3. Nguy?n Võ H?ng et al, (2005) Nghiên c?u c? ch? và chính sách khuy?n khích ??i m?i công ngh? ? doanh nghi?p v?a và nh? (SMEs) có v?n nhà n??c. Báo cáo ?? tài nghiên c?u c?p B?. NISTPASS. Hà N?i.
Ti?ng Anh:
4. CBO. (1990) Using R&D Consortia for Commercial Innovation: SEMATECH, X-ray Lithography, and High-Resolution Systems. CBO.
5. EC. (2005) Report on European Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives: Forstering Public-Private R&D Partnerships to Boost Europe’s Industrial Competitiveness. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
6. EC. (2009) Mobilising private and public investment for recorvery and long term structural change: developing Public Private Partnerships. Brussels.
7. EC. (2011) Partnering in Research and Innovation. Brussels.
8. EU. (2006) Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demostration activities (2007-2013). Brussels.
9. EU. (2013) Council Decision establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for research and innovation (2014-2020). Brussels.
10. EU. (2013) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 110/2014 on the model financial regulation for public-private partnership bodies referred to in Article 209 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels.
11. OECD. (1998) Science Technology Industry Review No.23: Special Issue on “Public/Private Partnerships in Science and Technology. Paris.
12. USAID. (1998) Partnering for Results: a User’s Guide to Inter-sectoral Partnering. USAID. (1999) Partnering for Results: Vollume II: Assessing the Impact of Intersectoral Partnering.
14. USAID. (2001) Designing and Managing Partnerships Between U.S. and Host – Country Entities. CDIE.
15. World Bank. (2010) Innovation Policy: a Guide for Developing Countries. The World Bank.
16. GTZ. (2015) ASEAN Policy Framework on Public-Private Partnerships for Technology Development and Innovation.
17. Nelson, R., Winter, G.W. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Freman, C. (1987) Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
19. Lundvall B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
20. Nelson, R. (ed.). (1993) National Innovation Systems. A comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Edquist C. (2005) “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges” in Fagerberg J, Mowery D.C and Nelson R.R (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of
Innovation. Oxford Uninvesity Press.
22. Scotchmer, S. (2005), Innovation and Incentives. The MIT Press. Cambridge.
23. Weimer, D., Vining A.R. (2005) Policy Ananlysis - Concepts and Practice. Pearson Prentice Hall.
24. Yescombe E.R. (2007) Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. Butterworth-Heinemann.
25. Lundvall B.A, Chaminade C. & Vang J. (2009) Handbook of Innovation System in Developing Countries. Edward Elgar.
26. Loxley J. (2010) Public Service Private Profits: the Political Economy of PublicPrivate Partnerships in Canada. Fernwood Publishing. Canada.
27. Soete L., Verpagen B., Weel B.T. (2010) System of Innovation in Hall B.H. and Rosenberg N.(Eds). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vollume 2. Elsevier.
28. Kadura B, Langbein J and Wilde K. (2011) Strenthening Innovation Systems: Foundation, Concept and Strategic Approach. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
29. Schacht W.H. (2011) Manufacturing Extension Partnership Program: An Overview. Congressional Research Service.
Downloads
Published
17-05-2017
How to Cite
Hung, N. V. (2017). International practice, national context and issues for public private partnership in implementation of science and technology tasks in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 5(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/115
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
