Technological promotion: a policy opportunity for provision of technical supports to small and medium enterprises in Vietnam
Keywords:Private-public partnership relation, Technological promotion, Technological propagation
The paper provides theoretical backgrounds of technological promotion, a policy of direct supports to enterprises for stimulation of modernization and improvement of technologies with the main attentions focused on well formed small and medium enterprises, a clear identification of scope and subjective figures of technological promotion in policy space and highlighting of approaches based on modes of “hands-on indicating” and “oriented targeting” of technological promotion for enterprises. Analizing programs and organizations conducting certain technical supports for small and medium enterprises, the paper indicates that they, once based on State organizations, State staffs, State budgets and the so-called “begging-granting” practice, are difficult to arrive to “oriented targets” - large number of small and medium enterprises, the scope of impacts of these programes being not found enough large and deep. At the same time, these limitations show that the technological promotion is a policy opportunity with full potentials for use. The paper proposes an idea to design a technological promotion program in Vietnam based on network linkage with the core role of local technological promotion centers. The main principle here is the use of publicprivate partnership mechanisms for promotion of professional and dynamique supply of services and the use of public-public cooperation mechanism for mobilization of resources from line ministries, local bodies, international organizations, programs and projects which have targets to support small and medium enterprises. The idea of this design is relatively novel in Vietnam then naturally may lead to eventual conflicts and hitches with existing policies and mechanims. The paper also hints some directions to settle these hitches.
1. Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư (2020). Sách trắng doanh nghiệp Việt Nam năm 2019. Hà Nội: Nxb Thống Kê.
2. Tổng cục Thống kê (2019). Niên giám thống kê 2018. Hà Nội: Nxb Thống Kê.
3. Nguyễn Võ Hưng và các cộng sự (2003). Nghiên cứu cơ chế và chính sách phát triển thị trường công nghệ ở Việt Nam, Báo cáo Đề tài nghiên cứu cấp Bộ, NISTPASS.
4. Nguyễn Võ Hưng và các cộng sự (2006). Nghiên cứu cơ chế và chính sách khuyến khích đổi mới công nghệ ở doanh nghiệp nhỏ và vừa (SMEs) có vốn nhà nước, Báo cáo Đề tài nghiên cứu cấp Bộ, NISTPASS.
5. Nguyễn Võ Hưng và các cộng sự (2014). Vai trò của Nhà nước trong việc hình thành và phát triển hệ thống đổi mới quốc gia ở Việt nam, Báo cáo Đề tài nghiên cứu cấp Bộ, NISTPASS.
6. Nguyễn Võ Hưng và các cộng sự (2017). Nghiên cứu xây dựng cơ chế hợp tác công tư, đồng tài trợ thực hiện các nhiệm vụ KH&CN, Báo cáo Đề tài nghiên cứu cấp Bộ, NISTPASS.
7. Nguyễn Võ Hưng và các cộng sự (2019). Nghiên cứu cơ chế quan hệ đối tác công tư và các chính sách, giải pháp thúc đẩy hoạt động khuyến công nghệ tại Việt Nam, Báo cáo Đề tài nghiên cứu cấp Bộ, NISTPASS.
8. United States Government Accountability Office - GAO (2013). Global manufacturing: foreign government programs differ in some key respects from those in united states. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. GAO-13-365. 2013.
9. World Bank (2017). Vietnam: enhancing enterprise competitiveness and SME linkages. DC.
10. Ca T.N. and Hung N.V. (2011). “Vietnam: current debates on the transformation of academic institutions” in bo goransson and claes brundenius (ed), Universities in transition: the changing role and challenges for academic institutions, IDRC - Springer.
11. Ezell S., Atkinson R. (2011). International benchmarking of countries’s policies and programs supporting smes manufacturers. National Institute of Standard and Technology.
12. Fukugawa N. (2008). “Evaluating the strategy of local public technology centers in regional innovation systems: evidence from Japan”, Science and Public Policy, 35(3), 159-170p DOI: 10.3152/030234208X299062, <http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/beech/spp>.
13. Fukugawa N., Akira G. (2016). Problem Solving and Intermediation by Local Public Technology Centers in Regional Innovation Systems: The first report on a branchlevel survey on technical consultation. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 16-E-062. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, <http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/>.
14. Intarakumnerd P., Chatratana S., Jirathumkitkul P., Smitinont Th. (2010). Success and failures of an Intermediary in Triple Helix Relationships in developing countries. 8th Triple Helix International conference VIII on University, Industry and Government Linkages. Mandrid. Spain.
15. Kolodny H., Stymne B., Shani R., Figuera J.R., Lillrank P. (2001). “Design and policy choices for technology extension organizations”. Research Policy. 30 (2001) 201 - 225.
16. Lundvanll BA, Joseph K.J., Cristina Chaminade & Jan Vang (eds) (2009). Handbook of innovation system in developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Edward Elgar.
17. Ngo Minh Tuan (2017). Overview of existing models of supporting SMEs in Vietnam. CIEM. Hanoi.
18. Shapira P., Rosenfeld S. (1997). An overview of technology diffustion policies and programs to enhance the technological absorptive capabilities of small and medium enterprises. <https://www.scheller.gatech.edu/centers-initiatives/ciber/projects/workingpaper/1997/shapira2.pdf>
19. Shapira P., Wessner (2013). 21st Century manufacturing: the role of the menufacturing extension partnership program. National Academy of Sciences.
20. Shapira P., Youtie J. (2014). Building capabilities for innnovation in SMEs: a crosscountry comparison of technology extension policies and programmes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. Doi: 10.1504/IJRD.2011.040526.
21. Shapira, P. et al. (2015). Institutuions for Technology Diffusion, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.
22. Shapira P. (2017). “The next production revolution and institutions for technology diffusion”, in OECD, The next production revolution: implication for governments and business. Paris.
23. Shapira P., Youtie J. (2017). Impact of technology and innovation advisory services. Nesta Working Paper No. 13/19. 2014. 41p.
24. Supattaraprateep S. (2010). Thailand self-assessment report & best practice. Daegu Innitiative First - Cycle Assessment Workshop. Hongkong. China.
25. Yuwawutto S., Smitinont Th., Charoenanong N., Yokakul N., Chatratana S. (2010). Increase in effectiveness of technology development in Thai SMEs with group approach. 8th Triple Helix International conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages. Mandrid. Spain.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).