Pilot’s assessment of the vietnam provincial innovation index
Keywords:
Science and technology, Innovation, Innovation index, Measurement of innovation, Socio-economic developmentAbstract
The Global Innovation Index (GII) of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has been used by the Viet Nam Government since 2017 as a management toolkit for various ministries and agencies. As this index operates at the national level, thus authorities at provincial level have not yet played a role in improving Viet Nam's GII index. Provincial authorities with different characteristics require tailored solutions and socio-economic development models based on science, technology and innovation (STI). Establishing a provincial-level innovation index will provide a practice and comprehensive overview of the status of the socio-economic development model based on STI in each locality, offering evidence of strengths, weaknesses, potential factors, and necessary conditions to promote socio-economic development based on STI, thereby contributing to the nation's GII improvement. Building this provincial -level innovation index involves several steps, and the pilot assessment is expected to provide insights and foundations for the formal construction and implementation of this toolkit in the coming time. This article presents the results of the pilot’s assessment on the local-level innovation index conducted in 2021-2022, covering 18 localities based on the GII index framework and methodology.
Code:
Downloads
References
Nguyễn Thị Phương Mai (2020). Nghiên cứu đề xuất khung giải pháp của bộ, ngành, địa phương nhằm cải thiện chỉ số GII của Việt Nam và khả năng áp dụng phương pháp GII để đánh giá năng lực đổi mới sáng tạo ở cấp địa phương. Đề tài cấp Bộ 2018-2019. Viện Chiến lược và Chính sách khoa học và công nghệ. Hà Nội.
OECD/JRC (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD. EC.
WIPO (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016. Winning with Global Innovation. WIPO, Geneva.
Becker, W.M., Saisana, P. Paruolo. and Vandecasteele (2017). “Weights and Importance in Composite Indicators: Closing the Gap”. Ecological Indicators.
Carvalho, N, Carvalho, L, Nunes, S (2015). “A Methodology to measure innovation in European Union Through the National Innovation System”. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development. Vol 6. No.2, 2015.
Cherchye, L. et al. (2008). “Creating Composite Indicators with DEA and Robustess Analysis: The case of the Technology Achievement Index”. Journal of Operational Research Society 59: 239-51.
Kotsemir, M. (2013). “Measuring National Innovation Systems Efficiecncy - A Review of DEA Approach”. Working Paper. Basic Research Program. Series: Science, Technology and Innovation WP BRP 16/STI/2013. National Research University. Higher School of Economics.
Saisana, M. et al (2005). “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques as Tools for the Analysis and Validation of Composite Indicators”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 168 (2): 307-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
