Policy for public procurement of research results in Vietnam

Authors

  • Cao Thu Anh

Keywords:

Finance, Science and Technology, Policy, Procurement of research results

Abstract

The public procurement of research results is an interesting topic for research where very rich theories and practical experiences of the world show the advantages of this policy to promote innovation. The policy for public procurement of research results attracts recent attentions expressed in core science and technology (S&T) policy documents, namely: Resolution No. 46/NQ-CP by the Government on S&T, Law on S&T 2013, and Resolution No. 95/ND-CP dated 17th October 2014 by the Government on finance and investment for S&T. However, for designing and implementing a policy for public procurement of research results, it is necessary to get answers to certain problems such as “What is the procurement of research results?, “What are the objectives of this policy?â€, “Which lessons learnt from promulgation of the policy for procurement of research results by the State?â€, “Does Vietnam need to issue a policy for procurement of research results by the State?â€, “What would be stands of view and objectives of actors involved into the policy for procurement of research results by the State?†and others. In the scope of this study, the group of authors gives answers to the above noted questions and draws out some problems to issuance of a policy for procurement of research results by the State in Vietnam.

Code: 16120801

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tiếng Việt:
1. Chỉ thị số 2014/24/EU ngày 26/02/2014 của Nghị viện và Ủy ban Châu Âu về mua sắm công.
2. Bộ Khoa học và Công nghệ. 2011. Tờ trình Luật Khoa học và Công nghệ sửa đổi.
3. Bộ Khoa học và công nghệ. 2013. Khoa học và công nghệ Việt Nam năm 2013. Hà Nội, Nxb Khoa học và kỹ thuật.
4. CIEM. 2014. Năng lực cạnh tranh và công nghệ cấp độ doanh nghiệp ở Việt Nam: kết quả điều tra 2012-2013.
5. Nguyễn Lan Anh. 2003. Nghiên cứu cơ chế, biện pháp thúc đẩy ứng dụng kết quả nghiên cứu và phát triển sau nghiệm thu. Báo cáo tổng hợp đề tài cấp cơ sở, Viện Chiến lược và Chính sách KH&CN.
6. Đặng Duy Thịnh. 2008. Nghiên cứu đổi mới cơ chế, chính sách tài chính của Nhà nước đối với hoạt động KH&CN và hoạt động đổi mới (công nghệ). Đề tài cấp Bộ
KH&CN 2007-2008.
7. Phùng Văn Quân. 2013. “Làm sao để nghiên cứu ứng dụng thực tế được nhiều hơn?” Tạp chí Tia sáng,
8. Nguyễn Quang Tuấn. 2013. Nghiên cứu cơ sở lý luận và thực tiễn cho việc xây dựng chính sách thúc đẩy thương mại hóa kết quả nghiên cứu và phát triển của các tổ chức KH&CN Việt Nam. Đề tài cấp Bộ KH&CN 2012-2013.
9. Phùng Hồ Hải. 2015. “Về đánh giá và tài trợ cho nghiên cứu trong khoa học cơ bản”, Tạp chí Tia sáng, xem ngày 02/03/2015, <http://tiasang.com.vn/-quan-ly-khoahoc/ve-danh-gia-va-tai-tro-cho-nghien-cuu-trong-khoa-hoc-co-ban-8427> .
10. Vũ Đức Nghiệu. 2015. “Đôi điều trăn trở về nghiên cứu khoa học”, Bản tin ĐHQG Hà Nội.
Tiếng Anh:
11. OFT. 2004. Assessing the impact of public sector procurement on competition, Office of Fair Trading, Main Report
12. EU policy initiatives on Pre-Commercial Procurement and Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions, 2014.
13. EU, 2014: Public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC.
14. Von Hippel, E., 1986. “Lead users: a source of novel product concepts”. Management Science 32 (July, 7), 791-805.
15. Geroski, P.A. 1990. “Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy”. International Review of Applied Economics 4 (2), S.182–S.198.
16. Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & Tsipouri, L. (Eds.). 2000. Public technology procurement and innovation. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Thomas E Clarke, 2002. Unique features of an R&D work environment and research scientists and engineers, September 2002, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 58-69.
18. Blind, K., Buhrlen, B., Menrad, K., Hafner, S., Walz, R., Kotz, C. 2004. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems Research, New Products and Services: Analysis of Regulations Shaping New Markets. European Commission.
19. Mccrudden, C. 2004. Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes Natural Resources Forum 28(4): 257-267
20. Edler, J. Ruhland. 2005. “Innovation and Public Procurement”. Review of Issues at Stake. Final Report.
21. John Rigby, Luke Georghiou Lund University, Leif Hommen, Max Rolfstam, Charles Edquist, Lena Tsipouri và Mona Papadako. 2005. “Innovation and Public
Procurement”. Review of Issues at Stake, Study for the European Commission (No ENTR/03/24).
22. Pinnau, H., 2005. Exchange lights. 2:1 for the climate. Modern technology for more efficiency in: Presentation at the Conference on Public Procurement stimulating Research & Innovation, Brussels, 14 December 2005.
23. Cabral L, Cozzi G, Denicoló V, Spagnolo G, Zanza M. 2006. Procuring innovations. In: Dimitri N, Piga G, Spagnolo G (eds) Handbook of procurement. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp 483–528.
24. Edler, J. 2007a. Needs as Drivers for Innovation. Concepts and instruments of demand oriented innovation policy, Edition Sigma, Berlin.
25. Edler, J and Georshio. 2007b. Public procurement and innovation-Resurrecting the demand side Research Policy 36(7): 949-963.
26. Jakob Edler, Luke Georghiou. 2007. “Public procurement and innovationResurrecting the demand side”, Research Policy 36 (2007) pages: 949-963.
27. Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. G. 2007. “Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and
diverse preferences”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(4), 371-399.
28. Susana Borrás and Charles Edquist, 2013. The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.

Downloads

Published

15-10-2017

How to Cite

Anh, C. T. (2017). Policy for public procurement of research results in Vietnam. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 6(3), 42–55. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/226

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017)

Section

STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).