Technology capability assessment - Methods and applications
Keywords:
Technology capability, Technology assessmentAbstract
This paper is to review and evaluates the technology assessment methods and their expected results and then focus on an approach of technology assessment at national level. The paper ends with the proposal for selecting an appropriate method to meet the objectives of managers and policy makers.
Code: 12021801
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ti?ng Vi?t:
1. T? Bá H?ng. (1997) Nguyên lý phát tri?n d?a trên c? s? công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.1. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
2. ?ào Th? Quy, ??ng Xuân Ch?. (1997) ?ánh giá hàm l??ng công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.2. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
3. Lê V?n Thân. (1997) ?ánh giá trình ?? công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.4. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
4. Nguy?n Qu?nh Mai, Nguy?n Thu? Trang. (2007) Phân tích s? khác bi?t c?a m?t s? ph??ng pháp lu?n áp d?ng trong ?ánh giá trình ?? công ngh? t?i Vi?t Nam hi?n nay. K? y?u H?i th?o Khoa h?c công ngh? l?n th? 10.
Ti?ng Anh:
5. APCTT. (1989) A Framework for Technology - based Development - Technology Content Assessment (Volume 2 - 4 - 5). Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
6. J. D. Roessner, A. L. Porter, N. C. Newman & D. Cauffiel. (1995) Implementation and Further Analysis of Indicators of Technology-Based Competitiveness. Executive Summary, final report to National Science Foundation. Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology.
7. J. D. Roessner, A. L. Porter & N. C. Newman. 1996 Indicators of Technology-based Competitiveness of Nations. Summary Report, Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology, final report to National Science Foundation, July 1997, Sections edited into Science & Engineering Indicators- 1998, National Science Board, Washington, DC, p. 6-33 -- 6-37 and Appendix 6-23.
8. Competitiveness of Nations: Indicators for Twenty-Eight Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51 (1), 1996, pp. 133-149.
9. Alan L. Porter, J. D. Roessner, N. C. Newman & X-Y Jin. (2000) 1999 Indicators of Technology-Based Competitiveness of 33 Countries. Summary Report, Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology, final report to National Science Foundation.
10. Alan L. Porter, J. David Roessner, Nils C. Newman. (2004) High Tech Indicators: Who's Gaining?. Technology Policy and Assessment Center Georgia Tech, Technology Exports, Vol. VI, No. 3, p. 1-6.
11. Alan L. Porter et al. (2008) High Tech Indicators Technology-based Competitiveness of 33 Nations. 2007 Report. Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.
12. Ryan Barnes. (2007) Economic Indicators, Investopedia ULC. http://www.investopedia.com/university/releases/default.asp
1. T? Bá H?ng. (1997) Nguyên lý phát tri?n d?a trên c? s? công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.1. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
2. ?ào Th? Quy, ??ng Xuân Ch?. (1997) ?ánh giá hàm l??ng công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.2. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
3. Lê V?n Thân. (1997) ?ánh giá trình ?? công ngh?. Atlas Công ngh?, T.4. H.: Trung tâm Thông tin T? li?u KH&CN Qu?c gia.
4. Nguy?n Qu?nh Mai, Nguy?n Thu? Trang. (2007) Phân tích s? khác bi?t c?a m?t s? ph??ng pháp lu?n áp d?ng trong ?ánh giá trình ?? công ngh? t?i Vi?t Nam hi?n nay. K? y?u H?i th?o Khoa h?c công ngh? l?n th? 10.
Ti?ng Anh:
5. APCTT. (1989) A Framework for Technology - based Development - Technology Content Assessment (Volume 2 - 4 - 5). Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
6. J. D. Roessner, A. L. Porter, N. C. Newman & D. Cauffiel. (1995) Implementation and Further Analysis of Indicators of Technology-Based Competitiveness. Executive Summary, final report to National Science Foundation. Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology.
7. J. D. Roessner, A. L. Porter & N. C. Newman. 1996 Indicators of Technology-based Competitiveness of Nations. Summary Report, Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology, final report to National Science Foundation, July 1997, Sections edited into Science & Engineering Indicators- 1998, National Science Board, Washington, DC, p. 6-33 -- 6-37 and Appendix 6-23.
8. Competitiveness of Nations: Indicators for Twenty-Eight Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51 (1), 1996, pp. 133-149.
9. Alan L. Porter, J. D. Roessner, N. C. Newman & X-Y Jin. (2000) 1999 Indicators of Technology-Based Competitiveness of 33 Countries. Summary Report, Atlanta, TPAC, Georgia Institute of Technology, final report to National Science Foundation.
10. Alan L. Porter, J. David Roessner, Nils C. Newman. (2004) High Tech Indicators: Who's Gaining?. Technology Policy and Assessment Center Georgia Tech, Technology Exports, Vol. VI, No. 3, p. 1-6.
11. Alan L. Porter et al. (2008) High Tech Indicators Technology-based Competitiveness of 33 Nations. 2007 Report. Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.
12. Ryan Barnes. (2007) Economic Indicators, Investopedia ULC. http://www.investopedia.com/university/releases/default.asp
Downloads
Published
10-02-2017
How to Cite
Mai, N. Q. (2017). Technology capability assessment - Methods and applications. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 1(2), 34–43. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/26
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
