Framework for evaluation of startup promoting policies

Authors

  • Hoang Thi Hai Yen

Keywords:

Startup, Startup promoting policy, Policy evaluation, Framework for policy evaluation.

Abstract

The first section of the paper presents the identification of specific features of startup and the roles of policies in the startup eco-system. As to meet requirements of healthy development of the startup eco-system and objectives of successful startup, the startup related policies should be regularly reviewed and evaluated for appraisal and monitoring of effectiveness of issued policies during implementation stages.
The next section of the paper deals with a proposal by the author on a framework for evaluation of startup promoting policies from global concepts to details. The core components of the Framework include: (i) the set of indicators of components for 5 groups: stimulation of creative minds, entrepreneurship, links in startup eco-system down to supports for integration by startups into international markets; (ii) the system of startup related policies needs to be evaluated, from education and training, scientific research, commercialization of research results up to startup culture, incubation, finances and etc.; (iii) the system of concrete measurable indicators such as quantity of incubators, quantity of successfully incubated startups, types of capital sources accessible by startups and etc. The section is finished by two models proposed for brief evaluation of startup promoting policies which may be considered for application in Vietnam.

Code: 20020501

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tiếng Việt
1. Bộ Tư pháp (2018). “Tài liệu hướng dẫn nghiệp vụ Đánh giá tác động của chính sách”, <https://moj.gov.vn/Pages/home.aspx>
2. Phòng Thương mại và Công nghiệp Việt Nam (VCCI) (2016-2018). Báo cáo Chỉ số khởi nghiệp Việt Nam (GEM) (2015/2016, 2017/2018). Hà Nội, Nxb Giao thông vận tải.
3. Chu Thanh Hà (2016). Diễn đàn kinh tế tư nhân (VPSF) Đối thoại về chủ đề Kinh tế số, Hà Nội.
4. Đặng Ngọc Dinh (2018). “Thúc đẩy khởi nghiệp Đổi mới sáng tạo: Một số đánh giá và đề xuất chính sách”, Tạp chí Chính sách và Quản lý KH&CN, NISTPASS, Vol. 7, No1, 2018.
5. Hoàng Thị Hải Yến (2017a). “Kinh doanh trí tuệ và vai trò của các trường đại học trong việc thúc đẩy cộng đồng khởi nghiệp Việt Nam hội nhập toàn cầu”, Tạp chí Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn, ISSN 2354-1172, tập 3, số 1b, 2017, tr 95-107.
6. Hoàng Thị Hải Yến (2017b). “Xây dựng hệ tiêu chí đánh giá chính sách thúc đẩy khởi nghiệp trong bối cảnh toàn cầu hóa”, Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội - Chuyên san Nghiên cứu Chính sách và Quản lý, ISSN 2588-116, Tập 33, số 3, 2017, tr 72-93.
7. Hoàng Thị Hải Yến (2019). “Tháo gỡ các rào cản pháp lý nhằm nâng cao hiệu quả gọi vốn cho Startup ở Việt Nam”, Kỷ yếu Hội thảo quốc gia: Startup - những khía cạnh pháp lý về gọi vốn đầu tư. Hà Nội, Nxb Đại học Kinh tế Quốc dân, tr 68-91.
8. Phan Hoàng Lan (2017). Nghiên cứu xây dựng chương trình quốc gia hỗ trợ hệ sinh thái khởi nghiệp, Báo cáo tổng hợp đề tài cấp bộ, Bộ KH&CN.
9. Vũ Cao Đàm, Trịnh Ngọc Thạch, Đào Thanh Trường (2017). Kỹ năng đánh giá chính sách, Hà Nội, Nxb Thế giới.
Tiếng Anh
10. Centre for International Trade in Technology, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (2007). A Pilot study on Technology based start-ups, Department of Scientific & Industrial Research Government of India, New Delhi.
11. European Commission (2009). “Impact Assessment Guidelines”, <https://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/iag_2009_en.pdf>
12. European Commission (2010). “Handbook on Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework-Guidance document Rural Development 2007-2013”,<https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-previous/2007-2013/docs/document_en.pdf>
13. European Commission (2016). Policy Evaluation Framework, Paris, 25.04.16
14. HM Treasury (2011). “The Magenta Book, Guidance for evaluation”, <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-magenta-book>
15. Indicators report 2012. Arlington, <https://www.nsf.gov/nsb>.
16. National Science Board (2012). Research and Development, Innovation, and the Science and Engineering Workforce, A Companion to Science and Engineering.
17. OECD (2016). “Start-up Latin America 2016: Building an Innovative Future - Assessment and Recommendations”, <https://www.oecd.org/dev/americas/Startups2016-Assessment-and-Recommendations.pdf>
18. Startup Genome LLC (2017). “Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2017”, <https://startupgenome.com/reports>
19. The World Bank (2010). Handbook on Impact Evaluation. Quantitative Mothods and Practices, public No. 52099, Washington D.C.
20. Bollinger, L., Hope, K., & Utterback, J. M. (1983). “A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms”, Research Policy Vol. 12 (1), pp 1-14. DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(83)90023-9
21. Eric Ries (2011). The Lean Startup: How Constant Innovation Creates Radically Successful Businesses, Crown Business, New York, Published 6th October 2011.
22. Goran Forbici, “Policy evaluation framework”, <https://www.reach-energy.eu>
23. Innovation Helpdesk, (2003). Analysis of the typical growth path of technology-based companies in life sciences and information technology, and the role of different sources of innovation financing, NB-NA-17054-EN-C, ISBN 92-894-4569-6, Innovation papers No 32, 182 pp, July 2003.
24. Nadim Ahmad and Anders Hoffman (2017). A framework for Addressing and Measuring Entreprenuership, OECD, Paris.
25. Peter Thiel, Blake Masters (2014). Zero to One: Notes on Startups or How to Build the Future, Crown Business, New York.

Downloads

Published

19-06-2020

How to Cite

Yen, H. T. H. (2020). Framework for evaluation of startup promoting policies. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 9(1), 17–34. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/322

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020)

Section

STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).