Proposal of solutions to promote investments for R&D in Vietnam – vision from international experiences
Keywords:Science-technology, Research-development, R&D investment, Innovative enterprises
Investment for R&D is one of the highly important indexes for analysis and assessment of the national innovation system. Given the index of the total social investment (percentage of GDP) we can have certain ideas on the level of development of the economy in general and of the national innovation system in particular. From the point of view of the national innovation system through presentations of some related workshops, this paper makes focus on analysis of investment for R&D from some countries and companies in the world and then proposes directions of solution for increasing social investment for R&D in Vietnam.
1. Ngân hàng Thế giới, Bộ Kế hoạch và Đầu tư (2016). Việt Nam 2035: hướng tới Thịnh vượng, Sáng tạo, Công bằng và Dân chủ. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
2. Nguyễn Quang Tuấn (2018). Đánh giá thực trạng ứng dụng, chuyển giao kết quả các nhiệm vụ khoa học và công nghệ sử dụng ngân sách nhà nước vào sản xuất, đời sống. Báo cáo tổng hợp đề tài cấp Bộ, Viện Chiến lược và Chính sách Khoa học và Công nghệ, Hà Nội.
3. OECD (2009). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China 2008, OECD Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
4. OECD (2014). Science, Technology and Innovation in Vietnam, OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy, OECD Publishing.
5. OECD (2019). Main science and technology indicator, OECD Publishing, Paris.
6. STS (2011). China science & technology statistics data book, Ministry of Science and Technology, China.
7. Huawei (2018). 2018 Huawei Annual Report, Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd, Shenzhen.
8. Interbrand (2018). Best global brand 2018: Rankings, <https://www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2018/ranking/>
9. Strategy&PWC (2018). 2018 Global innovation 1000: what the top innovators get right, 2018 Global Innovation 1000 Fact Pack.
10. Samsung (2019). About Samsung: Corporate profile - history, <http://www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/ corporateprofile/history06.html>
11. UNESCO (2019). Gross domestic expenditure on R&D, Institute for Statistics, UNESCO, trích từ trang mạng: data.uis.unesco.org
12. World Bank (2019). Research and development as percentage of GDP, The World Bank Group.
13. Kim Linsu (1997). Immitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
14. Hsieh Chang-tai & Petert J. Klenow (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4): 1403-1448.
15. Lener Josh (2009). Boullevard of Broken Dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed and what to do about it, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
16. Joo Si Hyung & Keun Lee (2010). Samsung’s catch-up with Sony: An analysis using U.S. patent data, Journal of Asia-Pacific Economy, 15: 271-287.
17. Hong Sungman & Jin-Wook Choi (2011). Success and challenges in managing R&D policy performance in South Korea, Asian Research Policy, 2: 80-92.
18. Liu F.C, D.F. Simon, Y.T. Sun, and C. Cao (2011). China’s innovation policies: evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory, Research Policy, 40: 917-931.
19. Jung Jiwon & Jai S.Mah (2013). R&D policies of Korea and their implications for developing countries, Science, Technology and Society, 18(2): 165-188.
20. Madani Farshad, Abdulai Mimie, Jejung Ha, Rachanida Koosangsri (2014). Samsung’s innovation strategy in smartphones market, SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2014.
21. Madani Farshad, Abdulai Mimie, Jejung Ha, Rachanida Koosangsri (2014). Samsung’s innovation strategy in smartphones market, SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2014.
22. Ding Xuedong and Jun Li (2015). Incentives for innovation in China: building an innovative economy, Routledge, London.
23. Chong Guan (2016). Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei: strategies to success, NTCC, Nanyang Technological University.
24. Joo Si hyung, Chul Oh, Keun Lee (2016). Catch-up strategy of an emerging firm in an emerging country: analyzing the case of Huawei vs. Ericsson with patent data, International Journal of Technology Management, 72(1-3).
25. Ito Asei, Zhuoran Li, Min Wang (2017). Multi-level and multi-route innovation policies in China: A program evaluation based on firm-level data, Millenial Asia, 8(1): 78-101.
26. Jiang Fu-you, Chang-hua Lu, Zi-tong Huang and Jian Zhu (2017). An analysis of Huawei’s comprehensive innovation model and its enlightenment, CNSCE 2017.
27. Loic Souetre (2017). How profitable is the venture capital business? Stanford University, Stanford.
28. Burris Matthew (2018). The history of Samsung (1938-present), <https://www.lifewire.com/history-of-samsung-818809>
29. Schwab Klaus (2018). The global competiveness report 2018, World Economic Forum.
30. Shih, G (2015). China's Huawei leads international patent filings: WIPO, Thomson Reuters, <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-patent-idUSKBN0MF17820150319>
31. Soumitra Dutta, Bruno Lanvin and Sacha Wunsch-Vincent (2018). Global innovation index 2018, WIPO, Geneva.
32. Zilibotti Fabrizio (2017). Growing and slowing down like China, Journal of the European Economic Association, 15(5): 943-988.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).