Some problems on science-technology strategies
Keywords:
Science-technology strategy, PolicyAbstract
We are entering to the time for conclusion evaluations of science-technology strategies of 2011-2020 period and the building of science-technology strategies for 2021-2030 period. The conclusion evaluations of strategies, also important as the building of strategies, are complex works. Here the paper provides contributions to view some concepts on science-technology strategies.
This paper is to clarify some aspects on S&T strategies on leap forward development and scientific natures in documents of science-technology strategies, definition of objectives of science-technology strategies only on basis of old indicators, statistic works and objectives of science-technology strategies, science-technology strategies of businesses and national science-technology strategies, and innovation in science-technology strategies. At the same time, the paper indicates that the unproper concepts on science-technology strategies would lead to numerous consequenses.
Code: 20011001
Downloads
References
1. Trung tâm Thông tin Khoa học và Công nghệ Quốc gia, (2006a). “Hệ thống đổi mới quốc gia ở các nước đang phát triển”, Tổng luận Khoa học - Công nghệ - Kinh tế, số tháng 3/2006.
2. Trung tâm Thông tin Khoa học và Công nghệ Quốc gia, (2006b). “Hệ thống đổi mới quốc gia Châu Á”, Tổng luận Khoa học - Công nghệ - Kinh tế, số tháng 4/2006.
3. Nguyễn Hoàng Nam tổng hợp (2018). “Bell Labs - Viện nghiên cứu tư nhân độc nhất vô nhị”, Tạp chí Tia sáng, 09/08/2018, <https://tiasang.com.vn/khoa-hoc-congnghe/Bell-Labs--Vien-nghien-cuu-tu-nhan-doc-nhat-vo-nhi-12653>.
4. Tim Dutton (2018). “Tổng quan các chiến lược Quốc gia về AI”, Báo Khoa học và Phát triển, 20/7/2018, <http://khoahocphattrien.vn/chinh-sach/tong-quan-cac-chienluoc-quoc-gia-ve-ai/20180719031733187p1c785.htm>.
5. Tuấn Quang (tổng hợp) (2018). “R&D: Khoa học cơ bản và vai trò của tư nhân”, Tạp chí Tia sáng, 09/08/2018, <https://tiasang.com.vn/-quan-ly-khoa-hoc/RD-Khoa-hoc-coban-va-vai-tro-cua-tu-nhan-12652>.
Tiếng Anh
6. Harry R. Yarger (2006). Strategic Theory for the 21st Century: The Little Book on Big Strategy, The Letort Papers.
7. John Lewis Gaddis (2005). “Grand Strategy in the Second Term,” Foreign Affairs, January-February 2005.
8. Joint Doctrine Notes 1-18, Strategy, 25 April 2018, <https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/jdn_jg/jdn1_18.pdf?ver=2018-04-25-150439-540>
9. Robert H. Dorff (2003). “Strategy, Grand Strategy, and the Search for Security” The Search for Security: A U.S. Grand Strategy for the Twenty-First Century, Max G.Manwaring, Edwin G. Corr, and Robin H. Dorff, eds., Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
10. Stephen J. Cimbala (2001). Clausewitz and Chaos: Friction in War and Military Policy, Westport, CT: Praeger.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
