Solutions for higher quality of scientific research: Case study of National Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Studies
Keywords:
Scientific research, Research quality, Strategy and policyAbstract
Research quality is one of the problems of high attention in activities of social studies in general and strategy and policy studies in particular. On basis of the set of temporarily identified indicators and the actual survey of research activities by researchers of National Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Studies (NISTPASS), the authors of this paper made an initial assessment of research quality of some research projects implemented by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) and then, from these survey outcomes, propose some solutions to enhance research quality for strategy and policy studies.
Code: 15101601
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ti?ng Vi?t:
1. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? s?a ??i, Lu?t s? 29/2013/QH13 ngày 18/06/2013, Hà N?i.
2. Ngh? ??nh s? 201/2004/N?-CP ngày 10/12/2004 c?a Chính ph? v? ban hành quy ch? qu?n lý ho?t ??ng khoa h?c xã h?i và nhân v?n.
3. Thông t? liên t?ch s? 44/2007/TTLT/BTC-BKHCN ngày 07/05/2007 gi?a B? KH&CN và B? Tài chính, H??ng d?n ??nh m?c xây d?ng và phân b? d? toán kinh phí ??i v?i các ?? tài, d? án khoa h?c và công ngh? có s? d?ng ngân sách nhà n??c.
4. Thông t? liên t?ch s? 55/2015/TTLT/BTC-BKHCN ngày 22/4/2015 gi?a B? KH&CN và B? Tài chính, H??ng d?n ??nh m?c xây d?ng, phân b? d? toán và quy?t toán kinh phí ??i v?i nhi?m v? KH&CN có s? d?ng ngân sách nhà n??c.
Ti?ng Anh:
5. OECD (2007). Linkage between performance and institutions in the primary and secondary education sector, ECO/CPE/WP1(2007)4.
6. UNESCO. (2010) World Social Sciences Report 2010. UNESCO Publishing.
7. Sammons. P. (1996) Complexities in the judgement of school effectiveness, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(2), pp. 113-49.
8. Harden, A; Weston, R and Oakley, A. (1999) A review of the effectiveness and appropriateness of peer delivered health promotion intervention for young people.
http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk
9. Grayson, L. (2002) Evidence based policy and the quality of evidence: rethinking peer review. University of London.
10. Boaz Annette and Ashby Debrah. (2003) Fit for purpose? Assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice. University of London, London.
11. Mkandawire Thandika. (2007) Social development policies: new challenges for the social sciences, UNESCO 2007, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
12. Mandl Ulrike, Adriaan Dierx, Fadieune Ilzkovitz. (2008) The effectiveness of public spending, Economic Paper 301, European Commission.
13. National Academy of Science (NAS). (2009) On being a scientist. (Third Edition), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
14. Forsyth Ann (2011) A guide for students preparing written theses, research papers, or planning projects, in http://www.planetizen.com.
15. FSPS (2012) Preparing a thesis or a research paper at University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
16. Litman Todd. (2012) Evaluating research quality: guidelines for scholarship. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
1. Lu?t Khoa h?c và Công ngh? s?a ??i, Lu?t s? 29/2013/QH13 ngày 18/06/2013, Hà N?i.
2. Ngh? ??nh s? 201/2004/N?-CP ngày 10/12/2004 c?a Chính ph? v? ban hành quy ch? qu?n lý ho?t ??ng khoa h?c xã h?i và nhân v?n.
3. Thông t? liên t?ch s? 44/2007/TTLT/BTC-BKHCN ngày 07/05/2007 gi?a B? KH&CN và B? Tài chính, H??ng d?n ??nh m?c xây d?ng và phân b? d? toán kinh phí ??i v?i các ?? tài, d? án khoa h?c và công ngh? có s? d?ng ngân sách nhà n??c.
4. Thông t? liên t?ch s? 55/2015/TTLT/BTC-BKHCN ngày 22/4/2015 gi?a B? KH&CN và B? Tài chính, H??ng d?n ??nh m?c xây d?ng, phân b? d? toán và quy?t toán kinh phí ??i v?i nhi?m v? KH&CN có s? d?ng ngân sách nhà n??c.
Ti?ng Anh:
5. OECD (2007). Linkage between performance and institutions in the primary and secondary education sector, ECO/CPE/WP1(2007)4.
6. UNESCO. (2010) World Social Sciences Report 2010. UNESCO Publishing.
7. Sammons. P. (1996) Complexities in the judgement of school effectiveness, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(2), pp. 113-49.
8. Harden, A; Weston, R and Oakley, A. (1999) A review of the effectiveness and appropriateness of peer delivered health promotion intervention for young people.
http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk
9. Grayson, L. (2002) Evidence based policy and the quality of evidence: rethinking peer review. University of London.
10. Boaz Annette and Ashby Debrah. (2003) Fit for purpose? Assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice. University of London, London.
11. Mkandawire Thandika. (2007) Social development policies: new challenges for the social sciences, UNESCO 2007, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
12. Mandl Ulrike, Adriaan Dierx, Fadieune Ilzkovitz. (2008) The effectiveness of public spending, Economic Paper 301, European Commission.
13. National Academy of Science (NAS). (2009) On being a scientist. (Third Edition), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
14. Forsyth Ann (2011) A guide for students preparing written theses, research papers, or planning projects, in http://www.planetizen.com.
15. FSPS (2012) Preparing a thesis or a research paper at University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
16. Litman Todd. (2012) Evaluating research quality: guidelines for scholarship. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Quynh Trang, N. H. T., Van Anh, N. T., Anh, N. H., Hai, T. D., & Tuan, N. Q. Solutions for higher quality of scientific research: Case study of National Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Studies. Journal SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT, 4(4), 35–48. Retrieved from https://vietnamstijournal.net/index.php/JSTPM/article/view/174
Issue
Section
STUDIES OF STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
